LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2016-10576: Fuseki server wrapper and management API in fuseki before 1.0.1 downloads binary resources over HTTP, which...

Fuseki server wrapper and management API in fuseki before 1.0.1 downloads binary resources over HTTP, which leaves it vulnerable to MITM attacks. It may be possible to cause remote code execution (RCE) by swapping out the requested resources with an attacker controlled copy if the attacker is on the network or positioned in between the user and the remote server.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Older versions of the fuseki Node module downloaded binary resources over plain HTTP. A network attacker could potentially replace those downloads with malicious content. The main concern is compromise during installation or management activity, not direct exploitation of a running public web service based on the provided evidence.

Executive priority

Treat this as a targeted dependency hygiene issue. It is not listed as known exploited in the provided sources, but the potential impact includes code execution during vulnerable download paths. Prioritize if the module appears in production build pipelines or developer workstations.

Technical view

CVE-2016-10576 affects the Fuseki server wrapper and management API in the fuseki Node module before 1.0.1. Binary resources were fetched without transport encryption, mapped to CWE-311. If an attacker can perform a man-in-the-middle attack, substituted resources may lead to remote code execution.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to projects using the HackerOne fuseki Node module below 1.0.1, especially environments that install or operate it over untrusted networks. The source bundle does not identify broader Apache Jena Fuseki product exposure.

Exploitation context

The provided sources describe a man-in-the-middle prerequisite: the attacker must be on-path between the user and the remote server. The bundle does not show KEV listing, public exploitation, or exploit maturity evidence.

Researcher notes

Evidence is sparse and historical. The key issue is insecure HTTP transport for binary resources in fuseki before 1.0.1. Validate package identity carefully because the affected item is the HackerOne fuseki Node module, not every product named Fuseki.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade the fuseki Node module to 1.0.1 or later.
  • Check the original advisory and package guidance for any additional vendor instructions.
  • Avoid installing legacy dependencies over untrusted networks.
  • Remove unused fuseki Node module dependencies from applications and build systems.

Validation and detection

  • Search dependency manifests and lockfiles for the fuseki Node module.
  • Confirm installed versions are not below 1.0.1.
  • Review build logs for legacy HTTP binary downloads where available.
  • Check whether CI or developer environments still install this package.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-311: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2016-10576 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
HackerOnefuseki node module<1.0.1Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-311 · source CWE mapping

Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data

Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.