LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2016-10526: A common setup to deploy to gh-pages on every commit via a CI system is to expose a github token to ENV and...

A common setup to deploy to gh-pages on every commit via a CI system is to expose a github token to ENV and to use it directly in the auth part of the url. In module versions < 0.9.1 the auth portion of the url is outputted as part of the grunt tasks logging function. If this output is publicly available then the credentials should be considered compromised.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2016-10526 is a credential exposure issue in the grunt-gh-pages Node module. In common CI deployments, a GitHub token could be placed in a deployment URL, and affected versions logged that authenticated URL. If those CI logs were public or shared, the token should be treated as compromised.

Executive priority

Prioritize if the organization used public CI logs or open-source gh-pages deployment pipelines during the affected period. The main business risk is unauthorized repository access through leaked GitHub tokens.

Technical view

Affected grunt-gh-pages versions logged the URL auth component during Grunt task output. When CI jobs used GitHub tokens embedded in gh-pages deployment URLs, logs could disclose the token. The source bundle has inconsistent affected-version wording: the description says versions before 0.9.1, while affected data says up to 0.9.1.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely in older JavaScript projects using grunt-gh-pages for automated gh-pages publishing from CI, with GitHub tokens embedded in remote URLs and logs accessible outside trusted administrators.

Exploitation context

No active exploitation is indicated in the provided sources, and the CVE is not marked KEV. The practical risk is retrospective secret exposure through build logs rather than a network-reachable exploit path.

Researcher notes

The available evidence supports credential disclosure through logging, but not exploit prevalence or CVSS severity. Treat version boundaries carefully because the source bundle conflicts on whether 0.9.1 is affected or the fixed threshold.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify projects using grunt-gh-pages in CI deployment workflows.
  • Move off affected grunt-gh-pages releases using vendor advisory guidance.
  • Rotate GitHub tokens that may have appeared in CI logs.
  • Restrict CI log access and remove publicly exposed historical logs.
  • Avoid embedding credentials directly in deployment URLs.

Validation and detection

  • Search dependency manifests for grunt-gh-pages usage and recorded versions.
  • Review CI configuration for GitHub tokens embedded in gh-pages URLs.
  • Check historical CI logs for authenticated deployment URL output.
  • Confirm exposed or suspect GitHub tokens were revoked and replaced.
  • Verify current deployment logs do not print URL credentials.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-391: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Credential and access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references authentication or credential exposure, so valid-account and credential-access review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2016-10526 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
HackerOnegrunt-gh-pages node module<=0.9.1Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-391 · source CWE mapping

Unchecked Error Condition

Unchecked Error Condition represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.