LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2016-10224: An issue was discovered in Sauter NovaWeb web HMI.

An issue was discovered in Sauter NovaWeb web HMI. The application uses a protection mechanism that relies on the existence or values of a cookie, but it does not properly ensure that the cookie is valid for the associated user.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Discuss exposureBack to CVEs
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysisunknown

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Sauter NovaWeb Web HMI has a cookie-based protection weakness. The application may trust a cookie’s presence or value without proving it belongs to the correct user. For a building or industrial HMI, that can weaken access controls, but the supplied sources do not provide severity, CVSS, affected versions, or a confirmed patch.

Executive priority

Prioritize discovery and exposure reduction, especially if NovaWeb controls building or operational systems. Business urgency is unclear from the bundle because severity, version scope, and patch status are missing, but HMI access-control weaknesses deserve prompt operational review.

Technical view

CVE-2016-10224 describes improper validation of a cookie-based protection mechanism in Sauter NovaWeb Web HMI. The source bundle says the application does not properly ensure the cookie is valid for the associated user. No CWE, CVSS vector, exploit details, or version range is provided in the bundle.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to organizations operating Sauter NovaWeb Web HMI. Risk is higher where the HMI is reachable from untrusted networks, shared workstations, or weakly segmented operational environments. The bundle does not identify exact affected versions or deployment patterns.

Exploitation context

The bundle provides no evidence of active exploitation and the CVE is not marked as CISA KEV. It also does not include public exploit details. Treat this as an access-control concern requiring environment-specific validation rather than proof of immediate exploitation.

Researcher notes

The key technical question is whether cookie values can be accepted without binding to a user identity or valid session state. The supplied bundle does not include reproducible details, impacted versions, or fixes, so validation should stay defensive and focus on inventory, configuration, and vendor confirmation.

Mitigation direction

  • Check the ICS-CERT advisory and Sauter guidance for affected versions and fixes.
  • Restrict NovaWeb HMI access to trusted operational networks only.
  • Require authenticated VPN or equivalent controls before HMI access.
  • Review session handling and logout practices for shared operator workstations.
  • Monitor HMI access logs for unusual cookie or session reuse patterns.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory all Sauter NovaWeb Web HMI instances in operational environments.
  • Confirm product and version against vendor or ICS-CERT guidance.
  • Verify whether HMI interfaces are reachable from untrusted networks.
  • Review access logs for unexpected users or repeated session reuse.
  • Confirm compensating controls around HMI authentication and network segmentation.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Public sources used

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2016-10224 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/aSauter NovaWeb Web HMISauter NovaWeb Web HMIListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.