LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2015-7828: SAP HANA Database 1.00 SPS10 and earlier do not require authentication, which allows remote attackers to ex...

SAP HANA Database 1.00 SPS10 and earlier do not require authentication, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or have unspecified other impact via a TrexNet packet to the (1) fcopydir, (2) fmkdir, (3) frmdir, (4) getenv, (5) dumpenv, (6) fcopy, (7) fput, (8) fdel, (9) fmove, (10) fget, (11) fappend, (12) fdir, (13) getTraces, (14) kill, (15) pexec, (16) stop, or (17) pythonexec method, aka SAP Security Note 2165583.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysis

Security readout for executives and security teams

Older SAP HANA Database releases could accept certain TrexNet requests without authentication. A remote attacker reaching that service could execute arbitrary code or cause other unspecified impact, creating serious risk for systems that run affected HANA versions and expose the relevant interface. Exposure is most likely in legacy SAP HANA 1.00 SPS10 or earlier deployments where TrexNet is reachable from untrusted networks. The bundle does not provide CPEs, ports, default exposure, or supported-version status. Treat this as urgent for any legacy SAP HANA estate. Unauthenticated remote code execution against a database platform can affect confidentiality, integrity, availability, and business operations, even though current active exploitation is not shown in the bundle. Mitigation focus: Inventory SAP HANA systems and identify any 1.00 SPS10 or earlier instances.; Review and apply SAP Security Note 2165583 where applicable.; Restrict TrexNet and administrative interfaces to trusted management networks only..

Prepared

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Database behavior lookup

The CVE wording references database injection or access, so collection and exfiltration review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2015-7828 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.