LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2015-7267: Samsung 850 Pro and PM851 solid-state drives and Seagate ST500LT015 and ST500LT025 hard disk drives, when i...

Samsung 850 Pro and PM851 solid-state drives and Seagate ST500LT015 and ST500LT025 hard disk drives, when in sleep mode and operating in Opal or eDrive mode on Lenovo ThinkPad T440s laptops with BIOS 2.32; ThinkPad W541 laptops with BIOS 2.21; Dell Latitude E6410 laptops with BIOS A16; or Latitude E6430 laptops with BIOS A16, allow physically proximate attackers to bypass self-encrypting drive (SED) protection by leveraging failure to detect when SATA drives are unplugged in Sleep Mode, aka a "Hot Plug attack."

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This CVE describes a physical bypass of self-encrypting drive protection on specific older laptop, BIOS, and drive combinations. If an attacker has hands-on access while the machine is in sleep mode, the drive encryption boundary may be bypassed. The sources do not provide a CVSS score, active exploitation evidence, or a confirmed vendor fix.

Executive priority

Medium priority unless the organization still operates the exact legacy configurations with sensitive data. The business concern is loss of confidence in hardware encryption under physical access conditions, especially for lost, stolen, or unattended devices.

Technical view

The issue affects listed Samsung and Seagate SATA drives operating in Opal or eDrive mode on specified Lenovo ThinkPad and Dell Latitude BIOS versions. The weakness is failure to detect SATA drive unplugging during sleep mode, enabling a reported “Hot Plug attack” against SED protection. Evidence is narrow and configuration-dependent.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to organizations still using the named laptop models, BIOS versions, and drive models with Opal or eDrive enabled. Risk depends on physical access controls and sleep-mode behavior. Modern fleets may have little exposure, but legacy enterprise laptops should be checked.

Exploitation context

The CVE requires physical proximity and a vulnerable sleep-mode state. CISA KEV is false in the provided bundle, and no cited source states active exploitation. Treat this as a physical-access data protection risk, not a remote compromise risk.

Researcher notes

The record is unusually specific and lacks CVSS, CWE, and structured affected-product metadata. Analysis should stay tied to the named models and BIOS versions. Do not generalize this CVE to all SEDs or all Samsung, Seagate, Lenovo, or Dell products.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory systems for the exact laptop, BIOS, drive, and SED mode combinations.
  • Check Lenovo, Dell, Samsung, and Seagate guidance for fixes or supported configuration changes.
  • Prioritize retirement or replacement if affected legacy configurations remain in sensitive environments.
  • Review physical security controls for devices storing regulated or high-value data.
  • Avoid relying on affected SED configurations as the sole protection boundary.

Validation and detection

  • Match asset inventory against the CVE’s named laptops, BIOS versions, and drive models.
  • Confirm whether Opal or eDrive mode is enabled on matching devices.
  • Review endpoint power settings to identify use of sleep mode on matching systems.
  • Verify whether vendor advisories or firmware updates exist for discovered configurations.
  • Document residual exposure where affected hardware cannot be replaced quickly.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2015-7267 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.