LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2015-6254: The (1) Service Provider (SP) and (2) Identity Provider (IdP) in PicketLink before 2.7.0 does not ensure th...

The (1) Service Provider (SP) and (2) Identity Provider (IdP) in PicketLink before 2.7.0 does not ensure that the Destination attribute in a Response element in a SAML assertion matches the location from which the message was received, which allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via unknown vectors. NOTE: this identifier was SPLIT from CVE-2015-0277 per ADT2 due to different vulnerability types.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysis

Security readout for executives and security teams

PicketLink versions before 2.7.0 had a SAML validation gap. A service provider or identity provider could accept a SAML response without confirming its Destination matched the endpoint that received it. The public record says the impact and attack vectors are unspecified, so business urgency depends on whether legacy PicketLink still handles SSO in your environment. Exposure is most likely in legacy Java/JBoss or Red Hat environments using PicketLink before 2.7.0 for SAML SP or IdP functions. Internet-facing SSO endpoints raise concern, but the source bundle does not identify specific downstream products beyond PicketLink. Prioritize discovery first. This is old and lacks public severity details, but SAML authentication components are high-value infrastructure. Any confirmed PicketLink pre-2.7.0 deployment should be remediated through upgrade or vendor-supported packages. Mitigation focus: Identify applications using PicketLink for SAML SP or IdP functions.; Upgrade PicketLink to 2.7.0 or later where applicable.; Apply relevant Red Hat security advisories for packaged deployments..

Prepared

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2015-6254 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.