LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2015-5374: A vulnerability has been identified in Firmware variant PROFINET IO for EN100 Ethernet module : All version...

A vulnerability has been identified in Firmware variant PROFINET IO for EN100 Ethernet module : All versions < V1.04.01; Firmware variant Modbus TCP for EN100 Ethernet module : All versions < V1.11.00; Firmware variant DNP3 TCP for EN100 Ethernet module : All versions < V1.03; Firmware variant IEC 104 for EN100 Ethernet module : All versions < V1.21; EN100 Ethernet module included in SIPROTEC Merging Unit 6MU80 : All versions < 1.02.02. Specially crafted packets sent to port 50000/UDP could cause a denial-of-service of the affected device. A manual reboot may be required to recover the service of the device.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysis

Security readout for executives and security teams

CVE-2015-5374 is a denial-of-service issue in several Siemens EN100 Ethernet module firmware variants. Network packets sent to UDP port 50000 can disrupt the affected device, and recovery may require a manual reboot. The business risk is loss of availability in OT environments, not data theft or code execution based on the provided sources. Exposure is most likely where Siemens EN100-based SIPROTEC or 6MU80 devices are reachable on OT networks, especially if UDP port 50000 is accessible from engineering, operations, or less trusted network segments. Prioritize remediation for exposed or operationally critical devices. The vulnerability can cause service loss and may require hands-on recovery, which matters in substations or industrial environments where availability is safety and continuity critical. Mitigation focus: Upgrade affected Siemens EN100 firmware to the fixed versions named in the CVE description.; Restrict UDP port 50000 access to trusted management or OT hosts only.; Segment affected protection and control networks from IT and internet-facing networks..

Prepared

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2015-5374 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
5Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.