Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
CVE-2015-2692 affected AdBlock before version 2.21. A remote attacker could make the extension block chosen resources on websites or disable selected blocking filters. The business impact is browser-side trust and content integrity, not server compromise based on the provided sources.
Executive priority
Prioritize as a hygiene and endpoint control issue. It is unlikely to be a direct infrastructure emergency from the provided evidence, but outdated browser extensions can weaken user protections and create avoidable business risk.
Technical view
The CVE describes filter injection affecting AdBlock before 2.21. Remote attackers could alter client-side filtering decisions, including blocking arbitrary resources on arbitrary sites and disabling arbitrary blocking filters. The provided bundle does not include CVSS, CWE, CPEs, or detailed vendor advisory data.
Likely exposure
Exposure is limited to users running AdBlock versions earlier than 2.21. The bundle does not identify enterprise platforms, operating systems, browsers, or CPEs. Organizations should treat exposure as endpoint/browser-extension inventory driven.
Exploitation context
The CVE is not listed as CISA KEV in the provided data. The sources describe remote attacker capability, but the bundle does not provide evidence of active exploitation, exploit availability, or exploitation in the wild.
Researcher notes
The public bundle is sparse: no CVSS vector, CWE, CPE, or detailed affected matrix is provided. Analysis should remain scoped to AdBlock before 2.21 and the documented ability to manipulate blocking filters and resource blocking behavior.
Mitigation direction
- Inventory managed browsers for AdBlock extension versions.
- Upgrade AdBlock installations earlier than 2.21.
- Remove unmanaged or obsolete AdBlock installations where updates cannot be verified.
- Check extension vendor guidance for any additional remediation details.
- Prefer centrally managed browser extensions for enterprise users.
Validation and detection
- Confirm installed AdBlock versions across managed endpoints.
- Verify no users remain on versions before 2.21.
- Review browser extension management logs for unauthorized legacy installs.
- Check whether security tooling detects outdated browser extensions.
- Document any unmanaged browsers outside central inventory.
Public sources used
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
CVE-2015-2692 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
Open ATT&CK lookup- Severity
- Unknown
- CVSS
- Not scored
- Known Exploited
- No
- Published
CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
CVSS and timeline data
No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.
Source materials
- CVE List V5 sourceCVE List V5
- https://www.greinr.com/blog/2015/cve-2015-2692-adblock-filter-injection/CVE reference · x_refsource_MISC
- https://github.com/kzar/watchadblock/commit/5b77de6ea77e0eff2aa726d9722d64fb4964b985CVE reference · x_refsource_CONFIRM
Products and packages named in the record
CWE details
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.