LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2015-10148: Hirschmann HiLCOS Hard-coded Credentials SSH SSL Keys

Hirschmann HiLCOS devices OpenBAT, WLC, BAT300, BAT54 prior to 8.80 and OpenBAT prior to 9.10 are shipped with identical default SSH and SSL keys that cannot be changed, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to decrypt or intercept encrypted management communications. Attackers can perform man-in-the-middle attacks, impersonate devices, and expose sensitive information by leveraging the shared default cryptographic keys across multiple devices.

HighCVSS 8.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Certain Hirschmann HiLCOS devices reportedly shipped with the same built-in SSH and SSL keys. Because those keys cannot be changed, encrypted management traffic may be decrypted or impersonated by a remote unauthenticated attacker if they can position themselves in the communication path.

Executive priority

Treat this as high priority for industrial and network operations environments. The main business risk is loss of confidentiality and trust in encrypted device management, especially where these devices support critical connectivity or remote administration.

Technical view

The issue is CWE-321: hard-coded cryptographic keys. The bundle says OpenBAT, WLC, BAT300, and BAT54 before 8.80, plus OpenBAT before 9.10, use shared default SSH/SSL keys, enabling management-channel interception, device impersonation, and sensitive information exposure.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely in organizations operating Hirschmann HiLCOS-based wireless or industrial network equipment with SSH or SSL management enabled. Risk is highest where management interfaces or paths to them are reachable from untrusted networks or shared operational environments.

Exploitation context

The bundle marks KEV as false and provides no cited evidence of active exploitation. The described attack is network-based, unauthenticated, and depends on abusing shared device keys to intercept or impersonate encrypted management communications.

Researcher notes

Evidence is sufficient for the core weakness, but affected-version metadata is inconsistent: the prose says versions prior to 8.80 or 9.10, while the structured affected entry lists >= 9.10. Verify exact applicability against Belden guidance before final scoping.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify Hirschmann HiLCOS OpenBAT, WLC, BAT300, and BAT54 assets.
  • Check vendor advisory for corrected versions and supported upgrade paths.
  • Upgrade affected firmware where vendor guidance provides a fixed release.
  • Restrict management access to trusted administrative networks only.
  • Monitor for unexpected SSH or SSL certificate/key reuse across devices.
  • Disable unnecessary remote management services where operationally feasible.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory HiLCOS firmware versions and device models.
  • Compare versions against the vendor advisory, not only secondary metadata.
  • Confirm management interfaces are not internet-exposed.
  • Review network paths where interception could occur.
  • Check whether SSH/SSL management is enabled on affected devices.
  • Document compensating controls for devices awaiting upgrade.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-321: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2015-10148 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.8 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
3Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.8CVSS 4.0HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NVulnCheck
8.2CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N3.94.2VulnCheck

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

8.8High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2015-10148Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
BeldenHirschmann HiLCOS>= 9.10, 0, 0, 0affected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-321 · source CWE mapping

Use of Hard-coded Cryptographic Key

Use of Hard-coded Cryptographic Key represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.