LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2015-10067: oznetmaster SSharpSmartThreadPool SmartThreadPool.cs race condition

A vulnerability was found in oznetmaster SSharpSmartThreadPool. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown part of the file SSharpSmartThreadPool/SmartThreadPool.cs. The manipulation leads to race condition within a thread. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The patch is named 0e58073c831093aad75e077962e9fb55cad0dc5f. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-218463.

MediumCVSS 4.6Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2015-10067 is a race condition in oznetmaster SSharpSmartThreadPool. It may allow limited confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact, but the published CVSS data indicates high attack complexity and required low privileges. Treat it as a targeted component-risk item, not an internet-wide emergency.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation where this library is present in production or security-sensitive services. The score and exploit difficulty argue against emergency response, but the unknown affected-version range means inventory should happen promptly.

Technical view

The issue is classified as CWE-366 in SSharpSmartThreadPool/SmartThreadPool.cs. CVSS 3.1 score is 4.6 with adjacent attack vector, high complexity, low privileges, no user interaction, and low CIA impacts. The source names patch commit 0e58073c831093aad75e077962e9fb55cad0dc5f.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to environments using oznetmaster SSharpSmartThreadPool directly or through embedded forks. The source bundle does not identify affected versions or CPEs, so dependency and source inventory are required.

Exploitation context

No CISA KEV listing is reported, and the provided sources do not state active exploitation. VulDB characterizes exploitation as difficult with high attack complexity. Evidence is insufficient to claim public weaponization.

Researcher notes

The public record is sparse: affected versions are listed as n/a, CPEs are absent, and the impacted code area is only identified by file. Analysis should focus on confirming component presence and patch lineage before assessing business exposure.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify direct or transitive use of oznetmaster SSharpSmartThreadPool.
  • Apply the vendor patch commit 0e58073c831093aad75e077962e9fb55cad0dc5f.
  • If patching is unavailable, check vendor guidance and consider replacing the component.
  • Monitor CVE and vendor updates because affected versions are not specified.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory repositories and build manifests for SSharpSmartThreadPool references.
  • Check deployed artifacts for the vulnerable SmartThreadPool.cs lineage.
  • Verify whether patch commit 0e58073c831093aad75e077962e9fb55cad0dc5f is present.
  • Review concurrency tests around thread-pool behavior after remediation.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-366: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2015-10067 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
4.6 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
4.6CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L1.23.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

4.6Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2015-10067Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
oznetmasterSSharpSmartThreadPooln/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-366 · source CWE mapping

Race Condition within a Thread

Race Condition within a Thread represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.