Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
CVE-2015-10046 is a SQL injection issue in lolfeedback. The available sources do not identify the exact affected function or versions, but they point to a specific patch commit. Business risk is mainly for organizations that still run this project unpatched: an authenticated adjacent-network user could potentially affect stored data confidentiality, integrity, or availability.
Executive priority
Treat as a moderate remediation item unless lolfeedback protects sensitive data or is broadly reachable. The vulnerability class is serious, but the available evidence shows required privileges, adjacent-network access, no KEV listing, and incomplete affected-version detail.
Technical view
The source bundle maps the flaw to CWE-89 with CVSS 3.1 score 5.5: AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L. VulDB classifies it as critical, while the provided severity is medium. The patch identifier is Git commit 6cf0b5f2228cd8765f734badd37910051000f2b2. Exact vulnerable code path and affected versions are not provided.
Likely exposure
Exposure appears limited to environments running lolfeedback without the referenced patch. The CVSS vector indicates adjacent-network access and low privileges are required. No CPEs, supported version ranges, hosted-service details, or package distribution data are provided, so asset identification may require repository or software inventory review.
Exploitation context
The provided sources do not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation. The issue is SQL injection, so successful exploitation could affect database-backed data. However, the bundle does not provide exploit maturity, public proof-of-concept status, affected endpoint details, or evidence of internet-scale targeting.
Researcher notes
Key gaps are the unknown affected functionality, absent affected version range, and lack of CPEs. VulDB and the CVE record provide classification and patch linkage, but researchers should avoid assuming broader product impact beyond lolfeedback and the referenced patch context.
Mitigation direction
- Check whether lolfeedback is deployed or embedded in any internal service.
- Apply the referenced patch commit or current vendor-maintained equivalent.
- Restrict access to any lolfeedback instance until patch status is confirmed.
- Review database account privileges used by the application.
- Monitor application and database logs for unusual input-handling errors.
Validation and detection
- Confirm deployed code includes commit 6cf0b5f2228cd8765f734badd37910051000f2b2 or later equivalent.
- Verify software inventory for any lolfeedback forks or bundled copies.
- Review application input handling for parameterized database access.
- Confirm affected services are not reachable beyond intended adjacent networks.
- Document any uncertainty where version or route mapping cannot be proven.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
CWE-89: Database access and collection lookup
Injection into data stores can inform collection, data access, and exfiltration detection reviews. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupDatabase behavior lookup
The CVE wording references database injection or access, so collection and exfiltration review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCVE-2015-10046 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
Open ATT&CK lookup- Severity
- Medium
- CVSS
- 5.5 (3.1)
- Known Exploited
- No
- Published
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
CVSS vector scores
1 official scoreWe collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L2.13.4Primary CVE scoreVulnerability scoring details
Base CVSS 3.1 score
5.5MediumVector: CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Source materials
- CVE List V5 sourceCVE List V5
- https://vuldb.com/?id.218353CVE reference · vdb-entry, technical-description
- https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.218353CVE reference · signature, permissions-required
- https://github.com/philipblaquiere/lolfeedback/commit/6cf0b5f2228cd8765f734badd37910051000f2b2CVE reference · patch
Products and packages named in the record
CWE details
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.