LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2015-10044: gophergala sqldump sql injection

A vulnerability classified as critical was found in gophergala sqldump. This vulnerability affects unknown code. The manipulation leads to sql injection. The patch is identified as 76db54e9073b5248b8863e71a63d66a32d567d21. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. VDB-218350 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability.

MediumCVSS 5.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2015-10044 is a SQL injection issue in gophergala sqldump. The available record says a patch exists, but affected versions and vulnerable code paths are not identified. Business risk is moderate unless this tool is deployed in a sensitive environment or handles privileged database access.

Executive priority

Treat as a targeted remediation item, not a broad emergency. Prioritize quickly if sqldump is present near production databases or exposed to semi-trusted users.

Technical view

The vulnerability is classified as CWE-89 SQL injection in gophergala sqldump. CVSS 3.1 is 5.5 with adjacent-network attack vector, low complexity, low privileges, no user interaction, and low confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. The patch is commit 76db54e9073b5248b8863e71a63d66a32d567d21.

Likely exposure

Exposure appears limited to organizations running or embedding gophergala sqldump. The source bundle lists affected versions as n/a and provides no CPEs, so inventory confirmation is required before assuming impact.

Exploitation context

The bundle does not show KEV listing, active exploitation, public exploit activity, or a proof of concept. CVSS indicates exploitation requires adjacent-network access and low privileges, with no user interaction.

Researcher notes

Evidence is sparse: VulDB says unknown affected code and versions are not specified. The CVSS vector narrows likely attack conditions, but validation needs local code review against the referenced patch.

Mitigation direction

  • Apply or verify inclusion of commit 76db54e9073b5248b8863e71a63d66a32d567d21.
  • Check upstream project guidance for any additional fixed release information.
  • Limit sqldump access to trusted users and networks where operationally feasible.
  • Review database privileges used by sqldump and reduce unnecessary write access.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory systems, containers, and repositories for gophergala sqldump usage.
  • Compare deployed code against the referenced patch commit.
  • Confirm whether sqldump connects to sensitive or production databases.
  • Review application logs for unusual sqldump database errors or unexpected query activity.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-89: Database access and collection lookup

Injection into data stores can inform collection, data access, and exfiltration detection reviews. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Database behavior lookup

The CVE wording references database injection or access, so collection and exfiltration review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2015-10044 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.5CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L2.13.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5.5Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2015-10044Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
gophergalasqldumpn/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-89 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.