LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2015-10019: foxoverflow MySimplifiedSQL MySimplifiedSQL_Examples.php cross site scripting

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in foxoverflow MySimplifiedSQL. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file MySimplifiedSQL_Examples.php. The manipulation of the argument FirstName/LastName leads to cross site scripting. The attack may be initiated remotely. The patch is named 3b7481c72786f88041b7c2d83bb4f219f77f1293. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-217595.

MediumCVSS 4Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This is a cross-site scripting issue in foxoverflow MySimplifiedSQL. If the example PHP page is deployed and reachable, an authenticated remote user may be able to inject script through FirstName or LastName fields. The known impact is integrity only, not data theft or outage in the supplied CVSS.

Executive priority

Treat as a moderate hygiene fix. Prioritize internet-facing or partner-accessible deployments, especially where example files are still reachable. Business risk is lower than remote code execution, but XSS can still damage trust and support phishing or session abuse chains.

Technical view

CVE-2015-10019 maps to CWE-79 in MySimplifiedSQL_Examples.php. The source bundle identifies FirstName and LastName argument handling as vulnerable and cites patch commit 3b7481c72786f88041b7c2d83bb4f219f77f1293. CVSS v2 is 4.0 with network access, low complexity, and single authentication required.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to systems running foxoverflow MySimplifiedSQL where MySimplifiedSQL_Examples.php remains deployed and accessible. The bundle does not identify affected versions, CPEs, or package distributions, so inventory must be file- and repository-driven.

Exploitation context

The source says the attack may be initiated remotely, but CVSS indicates authentication is required. The bundle does not cite public exploitation or CISA KEV listing, so active exploitation should not be assumed.

Researcher notes

Key uncertainty is affected version scope; the bundle lists versions as n/a. Validation should focus on whether the vulnerable example file exists and whether the patch changed FirstName and LastName handling. Do not claim exploitation without new KEV or source evidence.

Mitigation direction

  • Apply the referenced upstream patch commit where MySimplifiedSQL is used.
  • Remove or restrict access to MySimplifiedSQL_Examples.php if it is not operationally required.
  • Confirm FirstName and LastName output is safely encoded after patching.
  • Check upstream project guidance for any additional version-specific remediation.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory repositories and deployments for foxoverflow MySimplifiedSQL and MySimplifiedSQL_Examples.php.
  • Verify deployed code includes commit 3b7481c72786f88041b7c2d83bb4f219f77f1293 or equivalent changes.
  • Run authenticated, non-destructive XSS regression tests on FirstName and LastName handling.
  • Review application logs for unusual authenticated requests to MySimplifiedSQL_Examples.php.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-79: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2015-10019 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
4 (2.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
4CVSS 2.0MediumAV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:N82.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 2.0 score

4Medium
CVSS 2.0 vector shape for CVE-2015-10019Access VectorAccess ComplexityAuthenticationConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:N

Access Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocal
Access Complexity
LowMediumHigh
Authentication
NoneSingleMultiple
Confidentiality Impact
CompletePartialNone
Integrity Impact
CompletePartialNone
Availability Impact
CompletePartialNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
foxoverflowMySimplifiedSQLn/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-79 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.