LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2014-9862: Integer signedness error in bspatch.c in bspatch in bsdiff, as used in Apple OS X before 10.11.6 and other...

Integer signedness error in bspatch.c in bspatch in bsdiff, as used in Apple OS X before 10.11.6 and other products, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (heap-based buffer overflow) via a crafted patch file.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysis

Security readout for executives and security teams

This flaw is in bspatch, a tool used to apply binary patches. A malicious patch file could trigger memory corruption, potentially causing a crash or arbitrary code execution when processed by vulnerable software. Business risk depends on whether systems or update workflows process untrusted patch files. Exposure is most likely where vulnerable bsdiff/bspatch code is installed or embedded and processes patch files from external or less-trusted sources. The bundle confirms Apple OS X before 10.11.6 and indicates broader downstream vendor handling, but exact affected inventories require local package and product verification. Prioritize remediation where patch files enter automated update, build, packaging, or device-management workflows. Legacy unmanaged systems and embedded third-party copies are the main concern. No active exploitation is shown in the provided sources, but arbitrary code execution potential makes unresolved exposure worth tracking. Mitigation focus: Apply vendor updates for affected operating systems and bsdiff/bspatch packages.; Upgrade Apple OS X systems older than 10.11.6 where still present.; Check FreeBSD, Debian, openSUSE, Gentoo, Ubuntu, Android, and ChromiumOS guidance where relevant..

Prepared

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2014-9862 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
9Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.