LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2014-9705: Heap-based buffer overflow in the enchant_broker_request_dict function in ext/enchant/enchant.c in PHP befo...

Heap-based buffer overflow in the enchant_broker_request_dict function in ext/enchant/enchant.c in PHP before 5.4.38, 5.5.x before 5.5.22, and 5.6.x before 5.6.6 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via vectors that trigger creation of multiple dictionaries.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysis

Security readout for executives and security teams

CVE-2014-9705 is an old PHP vulnerability in the Enchant spellchecking extension. A memory handling flaw could let a remote attacker execute code if an application exposed vulnerable Enchant dictionary behavior. The main business risk is legacy PHP running unpatched, especially internet-facing applications that still use the extension. Exposure is most likely in legacy PHP 5.4, 5.5, or 5.6 environments with the Enchant extension enabled and reachable through application functionality. Modern vendor-supported PHP builds are unlikely to be affected if 2015-era security updates were applied. Prioritize remediation where legacy PHP is internet-facing or supports business-critical applications. The vulnerability is old, so sustained exposure mainly indicates unmanaged legacy technology. If PHP 5.x remains in production, this should be handled as part of an urgent modernization and patch assurance effort. Mitigation focus: Upgrade PHP beyond the fixed versions named by the CVE record.; Apply relevant vendor security updates for Debian, Ubuntu, Red Hat, SUSE, Apple, Oracle, or HP platforms.; If upgrade is delayed, review vendor guidance for disabling or limiting Enchant exposure..

Prepared

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2014-9705 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
5Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.