LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2014-9101: Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Oxwall 1.7.0 (build 7907 and 7906) and SkaDat...

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Oxwall 1.7.0 (build 7907 and 7906) and SkaDate Lite 2.0 (build 7651) allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks or possibly have other unspecified impact via the (1) label parameter to admin/users/roles/, (2) lang[1][base][questions_account_type_5615100a931845eca8da20cfdf7327e0] in an AddAccountType action or (3) qst_name parameter in an addQuestion action to admin/questions/ajax-responder/, or (4) form_name or (5) restrictedUsername parameter to admin/restricted-usernames.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysis

Security readout for executives and security teams

CVE-2014-9101 is an old administrator-targeted CSRF issue in Oxwall 1.7.0 and SkaDate Lite 2.0. If an administrator is already logged in, a remote attacker could trick the browser into making unwanted admin requests that trigger XSS or other unspecified changes. Exposure is likely limited to legacy Oxwall or SkaDate Lite deployments matching the named versions, especially internet-facing sites with active administrator sessions. The provided data does not identify affected CPEs or newer patched versions. Treat this as a moderate legacy-platform risk. It is most urgent if the organization still runs the named products, exposes admin functions to the internet, or lacks compensating access controls. If no such systems exist, priority is low after inventory confirmation. Mitigation focus: Inventory any Oxwall or SkaDate Lite instances and confirm exact version/build.; Check vendor or project guidance for fixed releases or supported migration paths.; Restrict administrative interfaces to trusted networks or VPN where possible..

Prepared

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2014-9101 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
1Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.