LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2014-8523: Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in McAfee Network Data Loss Prevention (NDLP) before 9.3 al...

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in McAfee Network Data Loss Prevention (NDLP) before 9.3 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysisunknown

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This CVE describes a CSRF flaw in McAfee Network Data Loss Prevention before version 9.3. An attacker could potentially abuse a logged-in user’s browser to perform actions in the product, but the public record does not specify the exact action, victim role, or attack path.

Executive priority

Treat this as an inventory and lifecycle-management item unless your organization still runs pre-9.3 McAfee NDLP. Business urgency rises if the management interface is broadly reachable or if privileged users browse the web from the same session context.

Technical view

The CVE record identifies a cross-site request forgery issue in McAfee NDLP before 9.3 that allows remote attackers to hijack authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors. No CVSS score, CWE mapping, detailed endpoint, or vendor remediation text is included in the provided bundle.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to organizations running McAfee Network Data Loss Prevention versions before 9.3, especially if administrative or user web interfaces are reachable from user browsers. The source bundle does not identify affected CPEs or deployment modes.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or any cited evidence of active exploitation. Public details are sparse: the CVE says remote attackers and unknown vectors, but does not describe exploit prerequisites beyond hijacking an authenticated victim context.

Researcher notes

Evidence is incomplete. The public CVE text names CSRF, McAfee NDLP before 9.3, remote attackers, and unknown vectors. Do not assume specific endpoints, privileges, impact, or exploit availability without the McAfee advisory or internal product testing.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory McAfee NDLP deployments and identify any versions before 9.3.
  • Check McAfee SB10053 for the vendor-approved fix or upgrade path.
  • Upgrade or retire vulnerable NDLP versions according to vendor guidance.
  • Restrict access to NDLP web interfaces to trusted administrative networks.
  • Review administrative accounts and permissions for unnecessary exposure.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm installed McAfee NDLP version and compare it with the before-9.3 affected range.
  • Review vendor advisory SB10053 for exact applicability to your build.
  • Check whether NDLP web interfaces are reachable from normal user browsing environments.
  • Review audit logs for unusual authenticated configuration changes.
  • Verify CSRF defenses after remediation where the vendor provides validation guidance.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2014-8523 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.