Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
This affects organizations using Spring Security 3.1 through 3.2.4 with CAS Proxy ticket authentication. A malicious CAS service could cause another service to accept a proxy ticket that is not properly associated, bypassing service-to-service access controls. Systems not using CAS proxy tickets, or not making access decisions from the CAS Service value, are described as unaffected.
Executive priority
Treat as targeted and configuration-dependent. Prioritize identity-integrated Java applications where CAS mediates service-to-service access, especially sensitive internal services.
Technical view
Proxy ticket authentication used HttpServletRequest data populated from untrusted HTTP request input. In affected Spring Security versions, that could let one CAS service influence another service’s proxy-ticket authentication context and bypass restrictions on which CAS services may authenticate to each other.
Likely exposure
Exposure is limited to Spring Security 3.1 through 3.2.4 deployments using CAS Proxy tickets with access controls based on the CAS Service identity.
Exploitation context
The provided sources do not show active exploitation, KEV listing, public exploit use, CVSS scoring, or detailed exploit prerequisites beyond malicious CAS service behavior.
Researcher notes
Impact depends on CAS Proxy ticket use and service-based access decisions. The bundle lacks CVSS, CWE, fixed-version, and exploit-status detail, so validate against vendor advisory before final risk closure.
Mitigation direction
- Check Pivotal or Spring advisory guidance for fixed versions and supported upgrade paths.
- Disable CAS Proxy ticket authentication where it is not required.
- Avoid relying on untrusted request-derived CAS Service data for access decisions.
- Review service-to-service CAS authorization rules for affected applications.
Validation and detection
- Inventory applications using Spring Security 3.1 through 3.2.4.
- Identify whether CAS Proxy ticket authentication is enabled.
- Check whether authorization depends on the CAS Service identity.
- Confirm affected services have reviewed vendor guidance and remediation status.
Public sources used
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
CVE-2014-3527 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
Open ATT&CK lookup- Severity
- Unknown
- CVSS
- Not scored
- Known Exploited
- No
- Published
CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
CVSS and timeline data
No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.
Source materials
- CVE List V5 sourceCVE List V5
- https://pivotal.io/security/cve-2014-3527CVE reference · x_refsource_CONFIRM
Products and packages named in the record
CWE details
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.