LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2014-2723: In FortiBalancer 400, 1000, 2000 and 3000, a platform-specific remote access vulnerability has been discove...

In FortiBalancer 400, 1000, 2000 and 3000, a platform-specific remote access vulnerability has been discovered that may allow a remote user to gain privileged access to affected systems using SSH. The vulnerability is caused by a configuration error, and is not the result of an underlying SSH defect.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2014-2723 concerns specific FortiBalancer appliances where a configuration error may let a remote user gain privileged access over SSH. This is not described as an SSH protocol flaw. The supplied sources do not include affected firmware versions, CVSS, or a named fixed release.

Executive priority

Treat this as a priority exposure review for any named FortiBalancer appliances because the described impact is privileged remote access. Urgency is highest if SSH management is externally reachable. Evidence is incomplete, so remediation should be aligned with Fortinet guidance.

Technical view

The CVE describes a platform-specific remote access issue in FortiBalancer 400, 1000, 2000, and 3000. The impact is privileged access to affected systems via SSH due to configuration error. The provided record lacks CPEs, CWE mapping, CVSS metrics, exploit details, and patch/version guidance.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to organizations operating the named FortiBalancer models, especially where SSH management is reachable from untrusted or broadly accessible networks. The supplied data does not identify affected firmware versions or deployment conditions.

Exploitation context

The CVE record says remote privileged access may be possible via SSH. There is no KEV listing in the bundle and no cited evidence of active exploitation. No exploit maturity or public exploit details are provided.

Researcher notes

The useful facts are narrow: named FortiBalancer models, SSH-based remote privileged access, configuration-error cause, and no stated SSH defect. The bundle does not provide CVSS, CWE, affected versions, fixed versions, or exploitation evidence, so avoid broader product or exploit claims.

Mitigation direction

  • Review Fortinet advisory FG-IR-14-010 for affected builds and official remediation.
  • Restrict SSH management access to trusted administrative networks only.
  • Disable unnecessary remote SSH management where business operations allow.
  • Apply vendor-recommended updates or configuration changes when identified.
  • Monitor administrative SSH access for unexpected successful logins.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory FortiBalancer 400, 1000, 2000, and 3000 appliances.
  • Confirm whether SSH management is exposed to the internet or broad internal networks.
  • Compare appliance firmware and configuration against Fortinet guidance.
  • Review recent SSH administrative login history for anomalous access.
  • Document any uncertainty where product version data is unavailable.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2014-2723 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.