LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2014-1672: Check Point R75.47 Security Gateway and Management Server does not properly enforce Anti-Spoofing when the...

Check Point R75.47 Security Gateway and Management Server does not properly enforce Anti-Spoofing when the routing table is modified and the "Get - Interfaces with Topology" action is performed, which allows attackers to bypass intended access restrictions.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Discuss exposureBack to CVEs
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysisunknown

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A Check Point R75.47 gateway or management server could fail to enforce anti-spoofing correctly after routing changes and a topology discovery action. In business terms, a firewall control intended to block traffic pretending to come from an unauthorized network may not work as expected.

Executive priority

Treat this as an exposure-confirmation item first. If R75.47 protects important network boundaries, raise priority because the issue concerns firewall enforcement, not a minor application bug. Remediation should follow Check Point guidance.

Technical view

CVE-2014-1672 describes improper anti-spoofing enforcement in Check Point R75.47 Security Gateway and Management Server when the routing table is modified and "Get - Interfaces with Topology" is performed, allowing bypass of intended access restrictions. The bundle provides no CVSS, CWE, CPE, or detailed patch data.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most relevant where Check Point R75.47 is still used on perimeter, segmentation, or management infrastructure and topology is recalculated after route changes. The source bundle does not identify other affected versions or products.

Exploitation context

No active exploitation is stated in the provided sources, and the CVE is not listed as KEV. The described attack context is a security-bypass condition tied to routing table changes and interface topology retrieval, but public exploit details are not provided in the bundle.

Researcher notes

The public record is sparse: no CVSS, CWE, CPE list, exploit evidence, or detailed remediation text appears in the provided bundle. Analysis should remain limited to the stated R75.47 anti-spoofing bypass condition and the two cited references.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify any Check Point R75.47 gateways or management servers in production.
  • Review Check Point SK98087 for the vendor-supported fix or workaround.
  • Prioritize remediation for perimeter and segmentation firewalls first.
  • Verify anti-spoofing policy after routing or topology changes.
  • If unsupported, plan migration to a supported Check Point release.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm appliance and management server versions from asset inventory.
  • Check whether anti-spoofing is enabled on relevant interfaces.
  • Review recent routing table and topology discovery changes.
  • Test that intended access restrictions still block spoofed network paths.
  • Document compensating controls where remediation is pending.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Public sources used

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2014-1672 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.