LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2014-125111: namithjawahar Wp-Insert cross site scripting

A vulnerability was found in namithjawahar Wp-Insert up to 2.0.8 and classified as problematic. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality. The manipulation leads to cross site scripting. The attack may be launched remotely. Upgrading to version 2.0.9 is able to address this issue. The name of the patch is a07b7b08084b9b85859f3968ce7fde0fd1fcbba3. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-259628.

MediumCVSS 4Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2014-125111 is a cross-site scripting issue in the Wp-Insert WordPress plugin through version 2.0.8. A remote authenticated attacker may be able to affect page or admin-browser integrity. The named fix is upgrading to version 2.0.9. Sources do not identify the exact vulnerable function.

Executive priority

Treat this as a moderate remediation item. It is not listed as known exploited, but public-facing WordPress plugins are common exposure points. Patch during the next normal maintenance window, faster if untrusted authenticated users exist on affected sites.

Technical view

The record classifies this as CWE-79 XSS in namithjawahar Wp-Insert versions 2.0.0 through 2.0.8. CVSS 2.0 is 4.0 with network access, low complexity, single authentication, partial integrity impact, and no confidentiality or availability impact. VulDB names commit a07b7b08084b9b85859f3968ce7fde0fd1fcbba3 as the patch.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to sites running Wp-Insert versions 2.0.0 through 2.0.8. The CVSS vector indicates authentication is required, so risk is highest where less-trusted users have accounts or plugin-related access. No affected CPEs or specific vulnerable feature are provided.

Exploitation context

The source bundle says the attack may be launched remotely, but CVSS requires authentication. CISA KEV status is false, and no cited source states active exploitation. VulDB offers CTI indicators behind a permissions-required reference, but the bundle does not provide public exploit evidence.

Researcher notes

Evidence is thin: the public description does not identify the vulnerable function or request surface. Do not assume unauthenticated exploitation. Focus validation on version detection and patch presence, then consult the vendor or patch diff for precise root-cause analysis.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade Wp-Insert to version 2.0.9 or later.
  • Confirm the patch commit is included in deployed plugin code.
  • Inventory WordPress sites for Wp-Insert versions 2.0.0 through 2.0.8.
  • If upgrade is blocked, check vendor guidance and reduce plugin exposure.
  • Review authenticated user access on affected WordPress sites.

Validation and detection

  • Check installed Wp-Insert version across WordPress environments.
  • Confirm version 2.0.9 or the named patch commit is present.
  • Review vulnerability management records for affected plugin instances.
  • Verify no production site still runs versions 2.0.0 through 2.0.8.
  • Document any unpatched exceptions and compensating controls.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-79: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2014-125111 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
4 (2.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
4CVSS 2.0MediumAV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:N82.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 2.0 score

4Medium
CVSS 2.0 vector shape for CVE-2014-125111Access VectorAccess ComplexityAuthenticationConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:N

Access Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocal
Access Complexity
LowMediumHigh
Authentication
NoneSingleMultiple
Confidentiality Impact
CompletePartialNone
Integrity Impact
CompletePartialNone
Availability Impact
CompletePartialNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
namithjawaharWp-Insert2.0.0, 2.0.1, 2.0.2, 2.0.3, 2.0.4, 2.0.5, 2.0.6, 2.0.7, 2.0.8Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-79 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.