LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2014-0594: CSRF protection incorrectly disabled

In the Open Build Service (OBS) before version 2.4.6 the CSRF protection is incorrectly disabled in the web interface, allowing for requests without the user's consent.

HighCVSS 8.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Open Build Service web users could be tricked into sending unwanted requests because CSRF protection was incorrectly disabled before version 2.4.6. For an organization running OBS, this can let an attacker abuse a logged-in user's browser to perform unintended actions.

Executive priority

Treat as high priority for any production or internet-accessible OBS instance. The issue needs user interaction, but successful abuse could affect build service confidentiality, integrity, and availability through a trusted user's session.

Technical view

CVE-2014-0594 is a CWE-352 CSRF flaw in the Open Build Service web interface before 2.4.6. The CVSS 3.0 score is 8.8, with network attack vector, low complexity, required user interaction, and high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to organizations running openSUSE Open Build Service web interface versions before 2.4.6. The bundle does not provide CPEs, deployment details, or affected downstream package names, so inventory confirmation is required.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not show known active exploitation, and the CVE is not listed as KEV. Exploitation requires user interaction, typically a logged-in OBS web user being induced to make an unintended request.

Researcher notes

Evidence is strongest for product, class, and fixed-before version. The bundle identifies the vulnerable condition as CSRF protection disabled in the web interface, but does not include detailed affected-version ranges, exploit reports, or operational detection indicators.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade Open Build Service to version 2.4.6 or later.
  • Review SUSE and OBS vendor guidance for any supported backported fixes.
  • Restrict OBS web interface access to trusted networks where possible.
  • Re-authenticate sensitive admin workflows after remediation where operationally appropriate.

Validation and detection

  • Identify all Open Build Service web deployments and recorded versions.
  • Confirm no exposed OBS instance is running a version before 2.4.6.
  • Check vendor package metadata for a fixed or backported CSRF correction.
  • Review web security tests for CSRF token enforcement on state-changing actions.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2014-0594 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.8 (3.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.8CVSS 3.0HighCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H2.85.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.0 score

8.8High
CVSS 3.0 vector shape for CVE-2014-0594Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
openSUSEOpen Build ServiceunspecifiedListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.