LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2013-7309: The OSPF implementation in Extreme Networks EXOS does not consider the possibility of duplicate Link State...

The OSPF implementation in Extreme Networks EXOS does not consider the possibility of duplicate Link State ID values in Link State Advertisement (LSA) packets before performing operations on the LSA database, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (routing disruption) or obtain sensitive packet information via a crafted LSA packet, a related issue to CVE-2013-0149.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysis

Security readout for executives and security teams

This issue affects the OSPF routing implementation in Extreme Networks EXOS. A crafted OSPF LSA packet could disrupt routing or expose sensitive packet information. The bundle does not provide affected versions, CVSS, or a named patch, so urgency depends on whether EXOS runs OSPF in your environment. Exposure is most likely in organizations using Extreme Networks EXOS with OSPF enabled. The provided CVE data lists affected vendor and product fields as n/a, so exact EXOS versions and deployment conditions are not confirmed in the bundle. Treat this as a routing availability risk requiring targeted exposure review, not an immediate emergency based on the bundle. Prioritize networks where Extreme EXOS devices run OSPF in critical routing paths or interact with less-trusted routing neighbors. Mitigation focus: Review Extreme Networks and CERT VU#229804 guidance for affected EXOS versions and fixes.; Restrict OSPF participation to trusted routing peers where operationally feasible.; Use OSPF authentication and routing-plane controls if supported in your EXOS deployment..

Prepared

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

description · low confidence lookup

Database behavior lookup

The CVE wording references database injection or access, so collection and exfiltration review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2013-7309 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
1Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.