Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
Cryptocat versions before 2.0.22 had a cross-site scripting flaw in the conversation overview nickname display. A crafted nickname could run script in a user's browser context. Business urgency is mainly finding any remaining legacy Cryptocat use and removing or updating it.
Executive priority
Treat as a targeted legacy cleanup item, not an emergency, unless Cryptocat remains in active use for sensitive communication.
Technical view
The CVE identifies XSS in the Conversation Overview Nickname feature in Cryptocat before 2.0.22. The provided record has no CVSS, CWE, exploit telemetry, or detailed fix notes beyond the affected version boundary.
Likely exposure
Exposure appears limited to environments still using Cryptocat versions earlier than 2.0.22, likely as a legacy application or browser-based chat component.
Exploitation context
The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or cited evidence of active exploitation. Public references exist, but the bundle does not provide reliable exploit prevalence or in-the-wild status.
Researcher notes
Evidence is sparse. The affected component and version range are clear, but impact scoring, exact sanitization failure, exploit prerequisites, and patch details are not provided in the source bundle.
Mitigation direction
- Inventory any Cryptocat deployments or browser extensions.
- Move Cryptocat installations before 2.0.22 to 2.0.22 or later.
- Check vendor or project guidance before relying on unsupported legacy builds.
- Remove obsolete Cryptocat installations where business use is no longer required.
Validation and detection
- Confirm installed Cryptocat versions are not earlier than 2.0.22.
- Review asset inventory for legacy chat tools named Cryptocat.
- Check browser extension inventories for Cryptocat presence.
- Verify security records do not rely on assumed CVSS data for this CVE.
Public sources used
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
CVE-2013-4106 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
Open ATT&CK lookup- Severity
- Unknown
- CVSS
- Not scored
- Known Exploited
- No
- Published
CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
CVSS and timeline data
No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.
Source materials
- CVE List V5 sourceCVE List V5
- https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/07/10/15CVE reference · x_refsource_MISC
- https://tobtu.com/decryptocat.phpCVE reference · x_refsource_MISC
- https://www.securityfocus.com/bid/61099CVE reference · x_refsource_MISC
- https://vuldb.com/pl/?id.9433CVE reference · x_refsource_MISC
Products and packages named in the record
CWE details
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.