LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2013-2293: The CTransaction::FetchInputs method in bitcoind and Bitcoin-Qt before 0.8.0rc1 copies transactions from di...

The CTransaction::FetchInputs method in bitcoind and Bitcoin-Qt before 0.8.0rc1 copies transactions from disk to memory without incrementally checking for spent prevouts, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (disk I/O consumption) via a Bitcoin transaction with many inputs corresponding to many different parts of the stored block chain.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This flaw affects legacy bitcoind and Bitcoin-Qt versions before 0.8.0rc1. A remote attacker could make a node waste heavy disk I/O during transaction handling, causing denial of service. The provided sources do not show code execution, data theft, CVSS scoring, or active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat this as a legacy-technology cleanup issue unless old Bitcoin nodes still operate in business-critical environments. If such nodes exist, prioritize remediation because the impact is service disruption, not confidentiality loss.

Technical view

CTransaction::FetchInputs copied transactions from disk to memory before incrementally checking whether previous outputs were already spent. A crafted high-input Bitcoin transaction referencing many blockchain locations could force excessive disk reads and degrade node availability. Sources identify affected versions as before 0.8.0rc1.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to obsolete Bitcoin node software: bitcoind or Bitcoin-Qt before 0.8.0rc1. Modern maintained nodes are unlikely to be affected, but any archival, embedded, research, or forgotten legacy node should be checked.

Exploitation context

The bundle describes remote denial of service through disk I/O exhaustion. It does not include KEV status, active exploitation evidence, CVSS data, or proof that exploitation was observed in the wild.

Researcher notes

The public description is narrow and old. It names the vulnerable method and resource exhaustion mechanism but provides no CVSS, CWE, exploit telemetry, or detailed remediation note beyond the version boundary before 0.8.0rc1.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory any bitcoind or Bitcoin-Qt deployments and record exact versions.
  • Upgrade or retire deployments older than 0.8.0rc1.
  • Check Bitcoin project guidance before applying compensating controls.
  • Isolate unavoidable legacy nodes from untrusted peer exposure.
  • Monitor legacy nodes for unusual disk I/O during transaction processing.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm no production node reports a version older than 0.8.0rc1.
  • Review asset inventories for archived or embedded Bitcoin-Qt installations.
  • Check monitoring for repeated disk I/O saturation on Bitcoin nodes.
  • Verify legacy nodes are not exposed to untrusted peers.
  • Document any exception with owner, purpose, and retirement date.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2013-2293 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.