LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2013-1629: pip before 1.3 uses HTTP to retrieve packages from the PyPI repository, and does not perform integrity chec...

pip before 1.3 uses HTTP to retrieve packages from the PyPI repository, and does not perform integrity checks on package contents, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted response to a "pip install" operation.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysis

Security readout for executives and security teams

Old pip versions could download Python packages over unprotected HTTP without verifying package contents. An attacker positioned on the network could alter what pip received during installation and cause code to run. The main business concern is legacy build, deployment, or developer environments using pip before 1.3. Exposure is most likely in old Python environments, legacy CI images, build scripts, or unmanaged developer machines that still use pip before 1.3 or archived system packages. Current pip installations are not identified as affected by the provided sources. Treat this as a legacy supply-chain risk. It is urgent if old build or deployment systems still exist, because compromise during package installation can affect released software. If inventory confirms only modern pip is used, priority drops to documentation and control validation. Mitigation focus: Upgrade pip installations older than 1.3 using current PyPA or vendor guidance.; Remove or rebuild legacy CI and deployment images containing pre-1.3 pip.; Avoid dependency installation on untrusted networks until vulnerable tooling is replaced..

Prepared

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2013-1629 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.