LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2012-6664: Multiple directory traversal vulnerabilities in the TFTP Server in Distinct Intranet Servers 3.10 and earli...

Multiple directory traversal vulnerabilities in the TFTP Server in Distinct Intranet Servers 3.10 and earlier allow remote attackers to read or write arbitrary files via a .. (dot dot) in the (1) get or (2) put commands.

CriticalCVSS 9.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This flaw affects the TFTP Server in Distinct Intranet Servers 3.10 and earlier. A remote, unauthenticated attacker could use directory traversal in TFTP get or put operations to read or write arbitrary files. That creates serious confidentiality and integrity risk where the service is reachable.

Executive priority

Treat as urgent if the affected TFTP service is internet-facing or broadly reachable internally. The main business risk is unauthorized file disclosure or file tampering on legacy infrastructure. If no affected deployment exists, track as an inventory hygiene issue.

Technical view

CVE-2012-6664 is a CWE-22 directory traversal issue in TFTP get and put handling. The CVSS 3.1 score is 9.1: network reachable, low complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, high confidentiality and integrity impact, no stated availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely on legacy systems still running Distinct Intranet Servers 3.10 or earlier with TFTP reachable over the network. The bundle's structured affected-product fields are incomplete, so asset confirmation should rely on product inventory and service validation.

Exploitation context

The source bundle includes an Exploit-DB reference and a FortiGuard IPS reference, indicating public exploit knowledge and detection coverage. The CVE is not marked KEV, and the provided sources do not state active exploitation in the wild.

Researcher notes

The core evidence identifies traversal through TFTP get and put commands. The provided structured affected field says n/a, while the description names Distinct Intranet Servers 3.10 and earlier. Patch status is not established in the bundle.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify any Distinct Intranet Servers 3.10 or earlier deployments.
  • Disable the TFTP Server where it is not operationally required.
  • Restrict TFTP access to trusted management networks only.
  • Check vendor guidance for supported fixes or replacement options.
  • Use relevant IPS detection where available, including FortiGuard coverage.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory hosts for Distinct Intranet Servers and enabled TFTP services.
  • Confirm whether UDP TFTP exposure is reachable from untrusted networks.
  • Review TFTP logs for suspicious traversal patterns in file requests.
  • Verify firewall rules limit TFTP to approved sources.
  • Confirm IPS signatures are enabled and monitored where applicable.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-22: File access and web shell behavior lookup

File traversal and upload weaknesses can lead teams to review file, web shell, execution, and collection telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

File access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references file access or upload behavior, so file telemetry and web shell review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2012-6664 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.1CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N3.95.2Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9.1Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2012-6664Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-22 · source CWE mapping

Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')

Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.