LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2012-3523: The STARTTLS implementation in nnrpd in INN before 2.5.3 does not properly restrict I/O buffering, which al...

The STARTTLS implementation in nnrpd in INN before 2.5.3 does not properly restrict I/O buffering, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to insert commands into encrypted sessions by sending a cleartext command that is processed after TLS is in place, related to a "plaintext command injection" attack, a similar issue to CVE-2011-0411.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysis

Security readout for executives and security teams

CVE-2012-3523 affects INN's nnrpd STARTTLS handling before version 2.5.3. A network attacker positioned between client and server could inject plaintext commands that are processed after encryption starts. This can undermine trust in encrypted NNTP sessions, but the source bundle does not provide severity scoring or active exploitation evidence. Exposure is most likely on systems running INN nnrpd before 2.5.3 with STARTTLS enabled, especially internet-facing or untrusted-network NNTP services. The provided affected-product metadata is incomplete, so distribution package checks are necessary. Treat this as a targeted protocol-security fix for legacy NNTP infrastructure. It is not KEV-listed and lacks a severity score, but affected public or shared-network services should be updated because the flaw can compromise encrypted session integrity. Mitigation focus: Upgrade INN to 2.5.3 or a distribution package containing the STARTTLS fix.; Review Mandriva and openSUSE advisories for package-specific fixed versions.; Prioritize externally reachable nnrpd services and shared-network deployments..

Prepared

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2012-3523 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
1Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.