Security readout for executives and security teams
RabidHamster R4 Embedded Server 1.25 can be crashed or taken over remotely because it mishandles malformed HTTP request logging. An unauthenticated attacker could potentially run code as the web server process. Treat any internet-exposed instance as urgent until removed, isolated, or remediated according to vendor guidance. Exposure is limited to deployments of RabidHamster R4 Embedded Server version 1.25. Risk is highest where the service is reachable from untrusted networks or embedded in legacy systems with poor inventory coverage. Prioritize this as critical for any confirmed deployment, especially internet-facing systems. Public exploit material and unauthenticated remote code execution potential make legacy exposure unacceptable, even though active exploitation is not established in the supplied sources. Mitigation focus: Inventory for RabidHamster R4 Embedded Server 1.25 across internal and external assets.; Remove or disable affected instances where the service is no longer required.; Restrict access to trusted networks using firewall or segmentation controls..
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
CWE-121: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupExecution behavior lookup
The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCVE-2012-10058 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
Open ATT&CK lookup- Severity
- Critical
- CVSS
- 10 (4.0)
- Known Exploited
- No
- Published
Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H
CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
CVSS vector scores
1 official scoreWe collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H——Primary CVE scoreVulnerability scoring details
Base CVSS 4.0 score
10CriticalVector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H
Source materials
- CVE List V5 sourceCVE List V5
- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework/master/modules/exploits/windows/http/rabidhamster_r4_log.rbCVE reference · exploit
- https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/18929CVE reference · exploit
- https://advisories.checkpoint.com/defense/advisories/public/2013/cpai-07-jan405.htmlCVE reference · third-party-advisory
- https://www.rabidhamster.org/R4/download.phpCVE reference · product
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/rabidhamster-r4-log-entry-buffer-overflowCVE reference · third-party-advisory
Products and packages named in the record
CWE details
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
Stack-based Buffer Overflow
Stack-based Buffer Overflow represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.