LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2012-10039: ZEN Load Balancer Filelog Command Execution

ZEN Load Balancer versions 2.0 and 3.0-rc1 contain a command injection vulnerability in content2-2.cgi. The filelog parameter is passed directly into a backtick-delimited exec() call without sanitation. An authenticated attacker can inject arbitrary shell commands, resulting in remote code execution as the root user. ZEN Load Balancer is the predecessor of ZEVENET and SKUDONET. The affected versions (2.0 and 3.0-rc1) are no longer supported. SKUDONET CE is the current community-maintained successor.

CriticalCVSS 9.4Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

ZEN Load Balancer 2.0 and 3.0-rc1 can let a logged-in attacker run operating-system commands as root through a vulnerable log-viewing parameter. These versions are obsolete and unsupported, so any remaining deployment should be treated as a high-priority retirement or migration issue.

Executive priority

Treat this as urgent if affected systems remain in production. The business risk is full compromise of the load balancer as root, with potential traffic interception, outage, or lateral movement. Unsupported software raises remediation urgency.

Technical view

The flaw is CWE-78 command injection in content2-2.cgi. The filelog parameter is passed into a backtick-delimited exec() call without sanitization, enabling authenticated network attackers to achieve root-level remote code execution on affected ZEN Load Balancer versions.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to legacy ZEN Load Balancer 2.0 or 3.0-rc1 installations, especially internet- or broadly network-reachable administrative interfaces. Current ZEVENET or SKUDONET products are not listed as affected in the supplied sources.

Exploitation context

Public exploit references exist, including Rapid7 Metasploit and Exploit-DB entries. The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or other evidence of active exploitation, so active exploitation should not be assumed.

Researcher notes

This is an older 2012 disclosure assigned a newer CVE record. Sources support authenticated root RCE and public exploit availability, but not active exploitation. Evidence does not name a vendor patch for unsupported versions.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify and retire ZEN Load Balancer 2.0 and 3.0-rc1 systems.
  • Migrate to a supported load balancer platform or current maintained successor.
  • Restrict administrative interface access to trusted management networks only.
  • Review vendor or successor-project guidance for supported migration paths.
  • Use IPS or monitoring coverage where available during decommissioning.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory load balancers for ZEN Load Balancer 2.0 or 3.0-rc1.
  • Confirm whether administrative interfaces are reachable from untrusted networks.
  • Review authentication and administrative logs for unexpected access.
  • Check whether vulnerable content2-2.cgi functionality is present.
  • Verify retirement, isolation, or migration status for each legacy instance.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
7

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-78: Command execution behavior lookup

Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2012-10039 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.4 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
6Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.4CVSS 4.0CriticalCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:HPrimary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

9.4Critical
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2012-10039Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
ZEN Load BalancerZEN Load Balancer2.0, 3.0-rc1unknown
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-78 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.