LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2012-10033: Narcissus backend.php Image Configuration Command Injection

Narcissus is vulnerable to remote code execution via improper input handling in its image configuration workflow. Specifically, the backend.php script fails to sanitize the release parameter before passing it to the configure_image() function. This function invokes PHP’s passthru() with the unsanitized input, allowing attackers to inject arbitrary system commands. Exploitation occurs via a crafted POST request, resulting in command execution under the web server’s context.

CriticalCVSS 9.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Narcissus has a critical flaw that can let an unauthenticated remote attacker run operating-system commands through its image configuration backend. For a business, exposure matters only where the legacy Narcissus service is still deployed and reachable. The provided sources show public exploit material, but do not show active exploitation or a vendor patch.

Executive priority

Treat as urgent only where Narcissus is present. Public exploit references and unauthenticated command execution make exposed instances high business risk, but organizations not running Narcissus are not affected based on the provided sources.

Technical view

backend.php passes an unsanitized release parameter into configure_image(), which invokes PHP passthru(). This is OS command injection, CWE-78, with CVSS 4.0 score 9.3. Successful exploitation runs commands as the web server user. Sources identify Ångström Distribution Project Narcissus; no maintained fixed version is named in the bundle.

Likely exposure

Likely exposure is limited to organizations still running Narcissus, especially internet-facing backend.php or image configuration workflows. The bundle does not identify other affected products or specific vulnerable version ranges beyond Narcissus.

Exploitation context

The bundle includes Metasploit and Exploit-DB references, so public exploit knowledge exists. KEV is false, and no cited source in the bundle states active exploitation in the wild.

Researcher notes

Do not assume broad exposure. Focus validation on Narcissus deployments and backend.php reachability. Evidence supports command injection through release handling and passthru(), public exploit availability, and critical severity. Evidence does not establish active exploitation or a vendor-supplied patch.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory systems for Narcissus and exposed backend.php instances.
  • Remove or disable Narcissus if it is no longer required.
  • Restrict access to Narcissus administration paths to trusted networks.
  • Check vendor or distribution guidance for any maintained fix.
  • Monitor web server processes and logs for unexpected command execution.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether Narcissus is installed on any internal or internet-facing hosts.
  • Review web routes for accessible backend.php endpoints.
  • Check server logs for suspicious POST requests to image configuration workflows.
  • Verify the web server account has minimal operating-system privileges.
  • Document findings and remediation status in the vulnerability register.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
7

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-78: Command execution behavior lookup

Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2012-10033 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.3 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
6Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.3CVSS 4.0CriticalCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NPrimary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

9.3Critical
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2012-10033Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Ångström Distribution ProjectNarcissus*unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-78 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.