LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2012-10018: Mapplic Lite and Mapplic <= (Various Versions) - Server Side Request Forgery to Cross-Site Scirpting

The Mapplic and Mapplic Lite plugins for WordPress are vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in versions up to, and including 6.1, 1.0 respectively. This makes it possible for attackers to forgery requests coming from a vulnerable site's server and ultimately perform an XSS attack if requesting an SVG file.

HighCVSS 8.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This affects WordPress sites using Mapplic or Mapplic Lite. A remote unauthenticated attacker could make the site’s server fetch attacker-chosen content and may turn an SVG response into cross-site scripting. That can expose data or alter page behavior for visitors, depending on site configuration and reachable services.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-priority WordPress plugin exposure for affected sites, especially public marketing or customer portals. Prioritize inventory, upgrade decisions, and compensating controls. The source bundle does not prove active exploitation, but public references increase remediation urgency.

Technical view

The vulnerability is an SSRF issue, CWE-918, in Mapplic up to 6.1 and Mapplic Lite up to 1.0. The CVSS 3.1 score is 8.3 with network access, low complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, changed scope, and low confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to WordPress sites with the affected Mapplic or Mapplic Lite plugin versions installed and reachable over the network. Asset owners should verify plugin presence and version from WordPress inventory rather than relying only on external scanning.

Exploitation context

The bundle includes Packet Storm references, indicating public security research or proof material exists. It does not include CISA KEV status, and KEV is false, so there is no sourced evidence here of active exploitation in the wild.

Researcher notes

Evidence supports SSRF leading to possible XSS through SVG retrieval. Fixed-version detail is incomplete in the bundle beyond the stated affected ranges, so researchers should correlate Wordfence, vendor changelog, and WordPress Trac before making closure claims.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade Mapplic beyond 6.1 where vendor guidance confirms a fixed release.
  • Upgrade Mapplic Lite beyond 1.0 where WordPress plugin guidance confirms a fixed release.
  • Review the Mapplic changelog and WordPress Trac changeset for vendor-specific remediation details.
  • Disable or remove the plugin if a fixed version is unavailable.
  • Restrict server egress where feasible to reduce SSRF impact.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory WordPress sites for Mapplic and Mapplic Lite installations.
  • Confirm installed plugin versions against the affected ranges in the CVE description.
  • Review web server logs for unusual plugin requests involving remote resources or SVG content.
  • Check whether the WordPress plugin update history includes the relevant remediation changes.
  • Validate remediation in staging before production deployment.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
7

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-918: Information exposure and cloud metadata lookup

Information exposure and SSRF weaknesses can make discovery, cloud metadata, and credential material review relevant. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Cloud metadata behavior lookup

The CVE wording references SSRF or metadata access, so cloud discovery and credential material review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2012-10018 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.3 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
6Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.3CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L3.93.7Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8.3High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2012-10018Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
seklerMapplic Lite0unaffected
seklerMapplic - Custom Interactive Map WordPress Plugin0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-918 · source CWE mapping

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.