LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2012-10010: BestWebSoft Contact Form contact_form.php cntctfrm_settings_page cross-site request forgery

A vulnerability was found in BestWebSoft Contact Form 3.21. It has been classified as problematic. This affects the function cntctfrm_settings_page of the file contact_form.php. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Upgrading to version 3.22 is able to address this issue. The identifier of the patch is 8398d96ff0fe45ec9267d7259961c2ef89ed8005. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The identifier VDB-225321 was assigned to this vulnerability.

MediumCVSS 5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

BestWebSoft Contact Form 3.21 has a cross-site request forgery issue in its settings page. If a site administrator is tricked while logged in, settings could be changed without their intent. The cited sources say version 3.22 fixes it.

Executive priority

Treat this as a medium-priority hygiene fix for affected websites. It is not described as actively exploited, but the fix is a clear vendor upgrade and the business risk is unauthorized settings changes on sites still running version 3.21.

Technical view

CVE-2012-10010 is CWE-352 in contact_form.php, function cntctfrm_settings_page, affecting BestWebSoft Contact Form 3.21. The CVSS 2.0 vector is AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N, indicating remote, low-complexity integrity impact without confidentiality or availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to environments running BestWebSoft Contact Form version 3.21. Public-facing sites are more relevant because the issue is remotely triggerable, but the supplied sources do not identify broader affected versions or platforms beyond this component.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or other evidence of active exploitation. The attack class is CSRF, so practical impact depends on a victim with suitable privileges interacting with attacker-controlled content while authenticated.

Researcher notes

Evidence is concise: VulDB describes the vulnerable function and impact, and the GitHub reference identifies the patch commit. The bundle does not include proof-of-concept details, observed exploitation, or affected-version ranges beyond 3.21.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade BestWebSoft Contact Form 3.21 to version 3.22 or later.
  • Confirm the deployed component includes patch 8398d96ff0fe45ec9267d7259961c2ef89ed8005.
  • If immediate upgrade is blocked, check BestWebSoft guidance before choosing compensating controls.
  • Remove or disable the component where it is not required.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory sites for BestWebSoft Contact Form version 3.21.
  • Verify upgraded sites report version 3.22 or later.
  • Review Contact Form settings for unexpected changes during the exposure window.
  • Confirm vulnerability tracking records reference VDB-225321 and CVE-2012-10010.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2012-10010 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5 (2.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5CVSS 2.0MediumAV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N102.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 2.0 score

5Medium
CVSS 2.0 vector shape for CVE-2012-10010Access VectorAccess ComplexityAuthenticationConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N

Access Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocal
Access Complexity
LowMediumHigh
Authentication
NoneSingleMultiple
Confidentiality Impact
CompletePartialNone
Integrity Impact
CompletePartialNone
Availability Impact
CompletePartialNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
BestWebSoftContact Form3.21Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.