LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2011-4182: shell code injection via ESSID because of missing escaping of a variable

Missing escaping of ESSID values in sysconfig of SUSE Linux Enterprise allows attackers controlling an access point to cause execute arbitrary code. Affected releases are sysconfig prior to 0.83.7-2.1.

HighCVSS 7.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A malicious wireless access point could give a vulnerable SUSE sysconfig component a crafted network name and trigger command execution when the system processes it. The issue is serious for affected wireless clients because it can compromise confidentiality and integrity, but it requires proximity or control of a nearby access point and user/system interaction.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation for laptops, workstations, or field systems running affected SUSE Linux Enterprise releases with wireless enabled. Server-only environments without wireless ESSID processing likely have lower practical exposure.

Technical view

CVE-2011-4182 is a CWE-77 command injection issue caused by missing escaping of ESSID values in SUSE Linux Enterprise sysconfig before 0.83.7-2.1. The CVSS 3.0 vector is adjacent network, low complexity, no privileges, user interaction required, unchanged scope, high confidentiality and integrity impact, and no availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure appears limited to SUSE Linux Enterprise systems using affected sysconfig versions before 0.83.7-2.1, especially hosts that manage wireless networks and may process ESSID values from access points.

Exploitation context

The bundle does not show KEV listing or active exploitation evidence. A plausible attacker position is control of a wireless access point whose ESSID is processed by a vulnerable SUSE client.

Researcher notes

Evidence is sparse. The supplied SUSE reference list includes a Bugzilla item and a SUSE page for CVE-2017-15710, so use vendor package records to confirm exact affected releases and fixed builds before broad conclusions.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory SUSE Linux Enterprise systems using sysconfig for wireless networking.
  • Update sysconfig to 0.83.7-2.1 or later through SUSE-supported channels.
  • Avoid connecting affected hosts to untrusted wireless access points until remediated.
  • Review SUSE guidance for product-specific package names and maintenance status.

Validation and detection

  • Check installed sysconfig package versions against the 0.83.7-2.1 fixed threshold.
  • Confirm whether affected hosts process wireless ESSID values through sysconfig.
  • Verify patch deployment through package inventory or configuration management records.
  • Review wireless association timelines for unexpected sysconfig or network-script behavior.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-77: Command execution behavior lookup

Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2011-4182 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.3 (3.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.3CVSS 3.0HighCVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N2.15.2Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.0 score

7.3High
CVSS 3.0 vector shape for CVE-2011-4182Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
SUSE Linux EnterprisesysconfigunspecifiedListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-77 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.