LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2011-1397: Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Labor Reporting page in IBM Maximo Asset Management...

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Labor Reporting page in IBM Maximo Asset Management and Asset Management Essentials 6.2, 7.1, and 7.5; IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT 6.2, 7.1, and 7.2; IBM Tivoli Service Request Manager 7.1 and 7.2; IBM Maximo Service Desk 6.2; and IBM Tivoli Change and Configuration Management Database (CCMDB) 6.2, 7.1, and 7.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysis

Security readout for executives and security teams

An attacker could trick a logged-in Maximo or Tivoli user into submitting an unintended Labor Reporting action. The issue is CSRF, so it depends on a victim already being authenticated and interacting with attacker-controlled content. The source bundle does not detail the exact business action or data impact. Exposure is most likely in legacy IBM Maximo and Tivoli deployments matching versions 6.2, 7.1, 7.2, or 7.5 as listed. Public internet exposure is not stated in the bundle; assess both internal and externally reachable instances because CSRF can work through a user's browser session. Treat this as a legacy-platform exposure review rather than an emergency unless affected systems remain in use. Prioritize validation if Maximo or Tivoli systems manage operational assets, service desks, or IT change records, because unintended authenticated actions could affect business workflows. Mitigation focus: Identify any listed IBM Maximo or Tivoli versions in production or archives.; Review IBM advisory and APAR IV09193 for vendor-approved fixes or workarounds.; Apply relevant IBM maintenance, fix packs, or configuration guidance if applicable..

Prepared

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

description · low confidence lookup

Database behavior lookup

The CVE wording references database injection or access, so collection and exfiltration review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2011-1397 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.