LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2011-10019: Spreecommerce < 0.60.2 Search Parameter RCE

Spreecommerce versions prior to 0.60.2 contains a remote command execution vulnerability in its search functionality. The application fails to properly sanitize input passed via the search[send][] parameter, which is dynamically invoked using Ruby’s send method. This allows attackers to execute arbitrary shell commands on the server without authentication.

CriticalCVSS 10Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2011-10019 is a critical unauthenticated remote command execution issue in old Spreecommerce releases before 0.60.2. A vulnerable store could allow an internet attacker to run commands on the server through the search feature. Treat any legacy Spreecommerce storefront or fork as urgent until version and patch status are confirmed.

Executive priority

Handle as an urgent legacy-application risk. A vulnerable internet-facing store could become a full server compromise, and public exploit material increases operational urgency even without confirmed active exploitation evidence in the bundle.

Technical view

The issue is in Spreecommerce search handling, where input to the search[send][] parameter is dynamically invoked through Ruby send without proper sanitization. Sources describe arbitrary shell command execution without authentication. The record lists CVSS 4.0 score 10 and CWE-1321/CWE-94. Affected-version metadata is sparse, but the description identifies versions before 0.60.2.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely in legacy Spreecommerce deployments, abandoned storefronts, or forks based on versions before 0.60.2. The source bundle provides no CPEs and marks default status unknown, so asset inventory and application dependency review are required.

Exploitation context

Public exploit references exist, including Metasploit and Exploit-DB entries. The bundle does not identify CISA KEV listing or any cited evidence of active exploitation, so active exploitation should not be assumed from these sources alone.

Researcher notes

Focus validation on version provenance and search parameter handling. The affected record lacks CPE coverage and has sparse version metadata, so researchers should cross-check vendor advisory details, local code lineage, and dependency history before declaring assets unaffected.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade affected Spreecommerce installations to 0.60.2 or later per vendor guidance.
  • Identify and retire unsupported legacy Spreecommerce storefronts and forks.
  • Review the archived vendor advisory before changing production systems.
  • Prioritize internet-facing stores and administrative environments first.
  • Monitor vendor and project channels for any additional guidance.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory all Spreecommerce applications, including forks and archived storefronts.
  • Confirm each deployment version is 0.60.2 or later.
  • Review application logs for suspicious search[send][] parameter activity.
  • Verify public routes using non-destructive request review only.
  • Document uncertainty where version or fork lineage cannot be proven.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
7

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-1321: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-94: Code execution behavior lookup

Code execution and unsafe deserialization weaknesses often justify reviewing execution behavior and process telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2011-10019 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
10 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
6Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
10CVSS 4.0CriticalCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:HVulnCheck

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

10Critical
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2011-10019Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
SpreecommerceSpreecommerce0unknown
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-1321 · source CWE mapping

Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution')

Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-94 · source CWE mapping

Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')

Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.