LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2011-10012: NetOp Remote Control Client 9.5 .dws File Buffer Overflow

NetOp (now part of Impero Software) Remote Control Client v9.5 is vulnerable to a stack-based buffer overflow when processing .dws configuration files. If a .dws file contains a string longer than 520 bytes, the application fails to perform proper bounds checking, allowing an attacker to execute arbitrary code when the file is opened.

HighCVSS 8.4Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

NetOp Remote Control Client 9.5 can be compromised if a user opens a malicious .dws configuration file. The risk is high for any organization still running this legacy client, but exploitation requires user interaction and local file opening rather than direct remote network access.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-priority legacy software risk. It is not shown as actively exploited, but public exploit availability and potential code execution make unmanaged installations unacceptable.

Technical view

The issue is a stack-based buffer overflow in .dws file parsing. A string longer than 520 bytes can trigger memory corruption and arbitrary code execution when opened by NetOp Remote Control Client 9.5. Public exploit references exist, but the supplied sources do not show active exploitation or KEV listing.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely on older Windows endpoints where NetOp Remote Control Client 9.5 remains installed and users can receive or open .dws configuration files.

Exploitation context

The vulnerability has public exploit artifacts, including Metasploit and Exploit-DB references. The CVSS vector requires local access and active user interaction. The provided bundle does not support a claim of active in-the-wild exploitation.

Researcher notes

Focus validation on installed version, file-handler exposure, and user-driven attack paths. Evidence supports NetOp Remote Control Client 9.5 only; do not expand scope to other versions without vendor or advisory confirmation.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory endpoints for NetOp Remote Control Client 9.5.
  • Upgrade or remove affected legacy installations where possible.
  • Check current Impero or NetOp vendor guidance before relying on historical patch information.
  • Block or quarantine untrusted .dws attachments and downloads.
  • Limit file associations so .dws files do not open automatically in the client.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm installed NetOp Remote Control Client versions across managed endpoints.
  • Check whether .dws files are associated with the affected client.
  • Review email, web, and EDR telemetry for suspicious .dws file delivery or opening.
  • Verify endpoint controls block untrusted configuration files.
  • Confirm upgraded systems no longer run version 9.5.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
9

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-121: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2011-10012 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.4 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
8Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.4CVSS 4.0HighCVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NPrimary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

8.4High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2011-10012Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
NetOpRemote Control Client9.5unknown
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.