LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2010-2629: The Cisco Content Services Switch (CSS) 11500 with software 8.20.4.02 and the Application Control Engine (A...

The Cisco Content Services Switch (CSS) 11500 with software 8.20.4.02 and the Application Control Engine (ACE) 4710 with software A2(3.0) do not properly handle LF header terminators in situations where the GET line is terminated by CRLF, which allows remote attackers to conduct HTTP request smuggling attacks and possibly bypass intended header insertions via crafted header data, as demonstrated by an LF character between the ClientCert-Subject and ClientCert-Subject-CN headers. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2010-1576.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysis

Security readout for executives and security teams

This issue affects specific Cisco CSS 11500 and ACE 4710 software versions. They may mishandle unusual HTTP line endings, letting an attacker confuse how requests and headers are interpreted. The concern is bypassing intended security header insertions, especially where client certificate headers influence trust decisions. Exposure is likely limited to environments still running the named legacy Cisco CSS or ACE software in front of HTTP applications, especially where inserted certificate-related headers are trusted by back-end systems. Prioritize assessment if these legacy Cisco appliances still protect authentication-sensitive applications. The main business risk is a perimeter control misreading HTTP traffic and weakening trusted identity headers. Mitigation focus: Inventory for Cisco CSS 11500 8.20.4.02 and ACE 4710 A2(3.0).; Check Cisco guidance and advisories for supported fixed versions or retirement direction.; Avoid relying solely on inserted client certificate headers for authorization decisions..

Prepared

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2010-2629 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
1Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.