LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2010-20122: Xftp FTP Client <= 3.0 PWD Response Buffer Overflow

Xftp FTP Client version up to and including 3.0 (build 0238) contain a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability triggered by a maliciously crafted PWD response from an FTP server. When the client connects to a server and receives an overly long directory string in response to the PWD command, the client fails to properly validate the length of the input before copying it into a fixed-size buffer. This results in memory corruption and allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on the client system.

CriticalCVSS 9.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This flaw can let a malicious FTP server take control of a Windows system running an old Xftp client. The risk comes from the client trusting an overly long PWD directory response and corrupting memory. Treat any legacy Xftp 3.0 or earlier use as urgent to find and retire.

Executive priority

Prioritize this as a legacy software removal issue with critical impact. The vulnerable client is old, public exploit references exist, and compromise affects the endpoint running the client. Absence from KEV lowers evidence of active exploitation, not technical severity.

Technical view

Xftp FTP Client up to and including 3.0 build 0238 has a stack-based buffer overflow in handling PWD responses. A crafted, overly long directory string from an FTP server can corrupt memory and allow arbitrary code execution on the client system. The source bundle maps this to CWE-121 and CVSS 4.0 score 9.3.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely on endpoints or admin workstations still running legacy NetSarang Xftp 3.0 build 0238 or earlier. Risk requires the vulnerable client to connect to a malicious or compromised FTP server that returns the crafted PWD response.

Exploitation context

The bundle cites public exploit references in Metasploit and Exploit-DB, so proof-of-concept or exploit material exists publicly. KEV is false in the provided data, and no cited source states active exploitation in the wild.

Researcher notes

The CVSS vector lists UI:N, but the description says the client connects to a server and receives a malicious PWD response. Validate exposure around client-side FTP workflows, not server ownership alone. Vendor patch status is not established in the bundle, so avoid assuming a specific fixed version.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify and remove Xftp 3.0 build 0238 and earlier from endpoints.
  • Replace with a supported Xftp release or another maintained FTP client.
  • Check NetSarang guidance for vendor-approved fixes or upgrade paths.
  • Restrict legacy FTP client use to trusted destinations until removed.
  • Prioritize systems used by administrators or with privileged network access.

Validation and detection

  • Query endpoint software inventory for NetSarang Xftp installations and versions.
  • Confirm whether any detected install is version 3.0 build 0238 or earlier.
  • Review EDR telemetry for legacy Xftp execution on user and admin systems.
  • Check proxy, firewall, or DNS logs for FTP connections from affected endpoints.
  • Document compensating controls if removal cannot happen immediately.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
7

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-121: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2010-20122 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.3 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
6Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.3CVSS 4.0CriticalCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NVulnCheck

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

9.3Critical
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2010-20122Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
NetSarang Computer, Inc.Xftp FTP Client0unknown
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-121 · source CWE mapping

Stack-based Buffer Overflow

Stack-based Buffer Overflow represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.