LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2010-20121: EasyFTP Server <= 1.7.0.11 CWD Command Stack Buffer Overflow

EasyFTP Server versions up to 1.7.0.11 contain a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the FTP command parser. When processing the CWD (Change Working Directory) command, the server fails to properly validate the length of the input string, allowing attackers to overwrite memory on the stack. This flaw enables remote code execution without authentication, as EasyFTP allows anonymous access by default. The vulnerability was resolved in version 1.7.0.12, after which the product was renamed “UplusFtp.”

CriticalCVSS 9.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

EasyFTP Server up to 1.7.0.11 has a remotely reachable memory corruption flaw in its FTP directory-change handling. An unauthenticated attacker could potentially take control of the server process. The product is old and may now appear as UplusFtp, so the main business risk is forgotten legacy FTP exposure.

Executive priority

Treat as urgent for any reachable legacy FTP service. The combination of unauthenticated remote code execution, critical score, and public exploit references warrants rapid inventory and containment, even without KEV-confirmed active exploitation.

Technical view

The issue is a CWE-121 stack-based buffer overflow in the FTP CWD command parser. The source bundle rates it CVSS 4.0 9.3, network exploitable, low complexity, no privileges, and no user interaction. The bundle states the issue was fixed in version 1.7.0.12.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely in legacy Windows environments still running EasyFTP Server 1.7.0.11 or earlier, especially where FTP is reachable from untrusted networks. Because the product was renamed UplusFtp, inventory should check both names.

Exploitation context

The bundle cites public exploit and technical references, including Bugtraq, Metasploit, Exploit-DB, and a technical blog. CISA KEV status is false in the bundle, so there is no provided evidence of active exploitation.

Researcher notes

The source bundle contains an apparent affected-product inconsistency: the narrative names EasyFTP Server through 1.7.0.11, while the affected object lists version 0 with defaultStatus unaffected. Use vendor/version evidence from the advisory sources before final scoping decisions.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade EasyFTP Server to 1.7.0.12 or later where available.
  • If upgrade is unavailable, remove or replace the legacy FTP service.
  • Restrict FTP access to trusted networks only.
  • Disable anonymous access if still enabled.
  • Monitor vendor or maintainer guidance for UplusFtp/EasyFTP advisories.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory hosts for EasyFTP Server and UplusFtp installations.
  • Confirm installed versions are later than 1.7.0.11.
  • Check whether FTP is reachable from the internet or untrusted networks.
  • Review configuration for anonymous FTP access.
  • Prioritize any externally reachable legacy FTP server for remediation.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
10

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-121: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2010-20121 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.3 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
9Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.3CVSS 4.0CriticalCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NVulnCheck

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

9.3Critical
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2010-20121Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
KMiNT21 SoftwareEasyFTP Server0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-121 · source CWE mapping

Stack-based Buffer Overflow

Stack-based Buffer Overflow represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.