LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2010-20108: FTPPad <= 1.2.0 Stack Buffer Overflow

FTPPad <= 1.2.0 contains a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in its FTP directory listing parser. When the client connects to an FTP server and receives a crafted response to a LIST command containing an excessively long directory and filename, the application fails to properly validate input length. This results in a buffer overflow that overwrites the saved Extended Instruction Pointer (EIP), allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary code.

HighCVSS 8.4Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

FTPPad FTP Client versions described as 1.2.0 and earlier can be compromised when a user connects to a malicious or compromised FTP server. A crafted directory listing can crash the client and may allow code execution on the user’s Windows system.

Executive priority

Prioritize removal or replacement on business endpoints because exploitation can compromise a user workstation, but requires user interaction. This is urgent where legacy FTP workflows remain in use.

Technical view

The bundle describes a CWE-121 stack buffer overflow in FTPPad’s FTP LIST response parser. Excessively long directory and filename data can overwrite saved EIP, enabling arbitrary code execution. The CVSS v4.0 score is 8.4 with user interaction required.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely on workstations still running legacy FTPPad, especially users connecting to external, unknown, or partner FTP servers. The affected metadata is inconsistent: the title says <= 1.2.0, while the structured affected entry lists version 0 and default unaffected.

Exploitation context

Public exploit references are listed, including Metasploit, Exploit-DB, and Corelan material. The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation, so active exploitation should not be claimed from these sources alone.

Researcher notes

Key evidence comes from third-party advisory and public exploit references. The CVE record dates are recent, but the underlying research appears historical. Validate product/version facts carefully because affected-version metadata in the bundle is incomplete or inconsistent.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory endpoints for FTPPad FTP Client and installed versions.
  • Check vendor or trusted software sources for any official update or retirement guidance.
  • Remove or replace FTPPad where no maintained version is available.
  • Limit FTPPad use to trusted FTP servers until exposure is resolved.
  • Use endpoint controls to detect or block unexpected FTPPad execution.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether FTPPad is installed on managed workstations.
  • Verify installed versions against the <= 1.2.0 claim in the advisory sources.
  • Identify users who connect to external or untrusted FTP servers.
  • Review EDR telemetry for FTPPad crashes or suspicious child process activity.
  • Document the metadata inconsistency before closing remediation.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
7

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-121: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2010-20108 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.4 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
6Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.4CVSS 4.0HighCVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NVulnCheck

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

8.4High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2010-20108Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
FTPPadFTPPad FTP Client0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-121 · source CWE mapping

Stack-based Buffer Overflow

Stack-based Buffer Overflow represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.