LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2010-20045: FileWrangler <= 5.30 Stack Buffer Overflow

FileWrangler <= 5.30 suffers from a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability when parsing directory listings from an FTP server. A malicious server can send an overlong folder name in response to a LIST command, triggering memory corruption during client-side rendering. Exploitation requires passive user interaction—simply connecting to the server—without further input. Successful exploitation may lead to arbitrary code execution.

HighCVSS 8.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

FileWrangler versions up to 5.30 can be compromised when a user connects to a malicious FTP server. The server can return an overly long folder name that corrupts memory in the client. Successful exploitation may allow arbitrary code execution. The bundle does not show active KEV-listed exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-priority legacy software risk, especially in environments that still permit FTP client use. The business concern is endpoint compromise through normal-looking user activity, not server exposure. Prioritize inventory, removal, and outbound FTP restrictions.

Technical view

This is a stack-based buffer overflow in FileWrangler directory-listing parsing. A malicious FTP server response to LIST can trigger memory corruption during client-side rendering. The source bundle identifies CWE-121 and CVSS 4.0 score 8.5 with passive user interaction required and no privileges required.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to environments where CursorArts FileWrangler, especially version 5.30 or earlier, remains installed and used for FTP connections. Risk increases when users connect to unknown, external, or attacker-controlled FTP servers.

Exploitation context

Public exploit references are listed in the bundle, including Corelan, Rapid7 Metasploit, and Exploit-DB. KEV is false, so active exploitation is not established by the supplied evidence. Exploitation requires the client to connect to a malicious FTP server.

Researcher notes

The affected-version data is inconsistent: the title and description say FileWrangler <= 5.30, while the affected object lists version 0 with unknown default status. Use the CVE record and third-party advisory for scoping, but validate locally before declaring exposure.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory endpoints for FileWrangler installations and version information.
  • Remove or replace FileWrangler where it is no longer required.
  • Check CursorArts or trusted vendor guidance for any fixed release or advisory.
  • Restrict FileWrangler use to known, trusted FTP servers only.
  • Block unnecessary outbound FTP access from managed endpoints.

Validation and detection

  • Search software inventory for CursorArts FileWrangler and affected versions.
  • Review endpoint telemetry for recent FileWrangler process execution.
  • Review network logs for outbound FTP connections from FileWrangler hosts.
  • Confirm whether users can connect to arbitrary FTP servers.
  • Document compensating controls where removal is not immediately possible.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
7

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-121: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2010-20045 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.5 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
6Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.5CVSS 4.0HighCVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NVulnCheck

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

8.5High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2010-20045Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CursorArtsFileWrangler0unknown
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-121 · source CWE mapping

Stack-based Buffer Overflow

Stack-based Buffer Overflow represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.