LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2010-0685: The design of the dialplan functionality in Asterisk Open Source 1.2.x, 1.4.x, and 1.6.x; and Asterisk Busi...

The design of the dialplan functionality in Asterisk Open Source 1.2.x, 1.4.x, and 1.6.x; and Asterisk Business Edition B.x.x and C.x.x, when using the ${EXTEN} channel variable and wildcard pattern matches, allows context-dependent attackers to inject strings into the dialplan using metacharacters that are injected when the variable is expanded, as demonstrated using the Dial application to process a crafted SIP INVITE message that adds an unintended outgoing channel leg. NOTE: it could be argued that this is not a vulnerability in Asterisk, but a class of vulnerabilities that can occur in any program that uses this feature without the associated filtering functionality that is already available.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysis

Security readout for executives and security teams

This issue affects Asterisk deployments whose dialplan uses ${EXTEN} with wildcard pattern matching. An attacker who can influence the extension value, such as through SIP signaling, may cause unintended dialplan behavior, including an extra outbound call leg. Business risk depends heavily on the local dialplan and calling permissions. Most likely exposed systems are legacy Asterisk PBXs using wildcard dialplan patterns, ${EXTEN}, SIP access, and Dial or similar applications that can create outbound channels. Systems not using this dialplan pattern may not be affected. Prioritize assessment if legacy Asterisk systems can receive untrusted SIP traffic or place outbound calls. The main business concern is unauthorized call routing or toll exposure, but the available evidence does not confirm broad active exploitation. Mitigation focus: Review Digium AST-2010-002 and vendor package advisories for supported fixes.; Audit dialplans for ${EXTEN} use inside wildcard pattern matches.; Apply Asterisk filtering functions where attacker-influenced values enter dialplan logic..

Prepared

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2010-0685 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.