LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2010-0248: Microsoft Internet Explorer 6, 6 SP1, 7, and 8 does not properly handle objects in memory, which allows rem...

Microsoft Internet Explorer 6, 6 SP1, 7, and 8 does not properly handle objects in memory, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by accessing an object that (1) was not properly initialized or (2) is deleted, leading to memory corruption, aka "HTML Object Memory Corruption Vulnerability."

HighCVSS 8.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This is a remote code execution flaw in legacy Microsoft Internet Explorer versions 6, 6 SP1, 7, and 8. A memory-handling error can let an attacker run code if the vulnerable browser processes malicious content. Business risk is mainly legacy workstations or systems that still depend on these browsers without MS10-002 applied.

Executive priority

Treat as high priority only where legacy Internet Explorer remains in use. For modern environments with no IE6, IE7, or IE8 dependency, priority is inventory confirmation rather than emergency response.

Technical view

CVE-2010-0248 is an Internet Explorer HTML object memory corruption issue tied to improper object initialization or use after delete. The bundle maps it to CWE-416 and CVSS 3.1 score 8.1. Successful exploitation can affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability through arbitrary code execution.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to environments retaining Internet Explorer 6, 6 SP1, 7, or 8. The source bundle does not identify CPEs or broader affected products beyond those versions, so asset validation should focus on legacy Windows browser inventory and patch state.

Exploitation context

The bundle describes remote arbitrary code execution through memory corruption. It does not provide KEV status, and kev is false, so active exploitation should not be claimed from this evidence alone. Historical exploitation details are not assessed because they are not present in the provided bundle.

Researcher notes

The supplied affected list is empty, but the title and description identify IE 6, 6 SP1, 7, and 8. Evidence supports memory corruption, CWE-416, and remote code execution impact. Patch direction is anchored to Microsoft MS10-002; no exploit mechanics should be inferred.

Mitigation direction

  • Apply Microsoft MS10-002 guidance and related security updates.
  • Remove or isolate Internet Explorer 6, 7, and 8 where still present.
  • Restrict legacy browser use to required internal sites only.
  • Use vendor guidance for unsupported systems needing compensating controls.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory endpoints for Internet Explorer 6, 6 SP1, 7, and 8.
  • Verify MS10-002 or superseding Microsoft updates are installed.
  • Check vulnerability scanner coverage against OVAL definition 8267.
  • Confirm no business process still requires vulnerable IE versions.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-416: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2010-0248 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.1CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H2.25.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8.1High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2010-0248Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-416 · source CWE mapping

Use After Free

Use After Free represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.