LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2009-3767: libraries/libldap/tls_o.c in OpenLDAP 2.2 and 2.4, and possibly other versions, when OpenSSL is used, does...

libraries/libldap/tls_o.c in OpenLDAP 2.2 and 2.4, and possibly other versions, when OpenSSL is used, does not properly handle a '\0' character in a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) field of an X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof arbitrary SSL servers via a crafted certificate issued by a legitimate Certification Authority, a related issue to CVE-2009-2408.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysis

Security readout for executives and security teams

OpenLDAP clients using OpenSSL could be tricked by a malicious certificate containing a null character in the Common Name. In a man-in-the-middle position, an attacker could make one SSL server appear to be another. The business risk is credential or directory-traffic interception where vulnerable LDAP/TLS clients remain unpatched. Exposure is most likely on legacy systems or products still using affected OpenLDAP libldap versions with OpenSSL for LDAPS or StartTLS. Modern fully patched distributions are less likely exposed, but embedded appliances and unsupported servers need explicit inventory checks. Treat as a legacy exposure cleanup item with high impact where vulnerable LDAP/TLS clients remain. It is not supported as actively exploited by the provided sources, but directory authentication traffic makes lingering instances important to remove. Mitigation focus: Apply vendor OpenLDAP updates or supported distribution backports.; Prioritize systems using LDAPS or StartTLS for authentication paths.; Replace unsupported OpenLDAP builds with maintained packages..

Prepared

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2009-3767 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.