LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2008-1447: The DNS protocol, as implemented in (1) BIND 8 and 9 before 9.5.0-P1, 9.4.2-P1, and 9.3.5-P1; (2) Microsoft...

The DNS protocol, as implemented in (1) BIND 8 and 9 before 9.5.0-P1, 9.4.2-P1, and 9.3.5-P1; (2) Microsoft DNS in Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP2 and SP3, and Server 2003 SP1 and SP2; and other implementations allow remote attackers to spoof DNS traffic via a birthday attack that uses in-bailiwick referrals to conduct cache poisoning against recursive resolvers, related to insufficient randomness of DNS transaction IDs and source ports, aka "DNS Insufficient Socket Entropy Vulnerability" or "the Kaminsky bug."

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysis

Security readout for executives and security teams

This is the Kaminsky DNS cache-poisoning flaw. A remote attacker could trick vulnerable recursive DNS resolvers into caching false answers, potentially sending users to attacker-chosen systems instead of the intended domain. The issue affects old DNS resolver implementations and should be treated as important where legacy DNS infrastructure remains in use. Exposure is most likely in legacy recursive DNS resolvers, forwarders, appliances, or embedded systems that retained vulnerable DNS implementations. Modern, patched resolvers are less likely exposed. Inventory should include internal resolvers, branch-office DNS, network appliances, and vendor-managed DNS components. Prioritize remediation where any legacy recursive DNS service remains in production. The business risk is misdirection of users, mail, and application traffic through poisoned DNS responses. For fully patched modern DNS infrastructure, treat this as a legacy assurance and inventory issue. Mitigation focus: Upgrade BIND to vendor-fixed releases or later supported versions.; Apply Microsoft and other vendor DNS security updates where applicable.; Replace unsupported legacy DNS servers and appliances using vulnerable resolver code..

Prepared

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2008-1447 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
5Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.