LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2007-6626: Multiple buffer overflows in the RTSP_valid_response_msg function in RTSP_state_machine.c in LScube Feng 0....

Multiple buffer overflows in the RTSP_valid_response_msg function in RTSP_state_machine.c in LScube Feng 0.1.15 and earlier allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a long first line of a response, as demonstrated by a long VER line; or (2) a long second line of a response, as demonstrated by a message that follows a RETURN line.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Discuss exposureBack to CVEs
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysis

Security readout for executives and security teams

CVE-2007-6626 is a remote code execution risk in LScube Feng 0.1.15 and earlier. A malformed RTSP response with overly long lines can overflow buffers. For executives, the main concern is any legacy Feng RTSP service exposed to untrusted networks, because compromise could allow attacker-controlled code execution. Exposure is likely limited to organizations still running LScube Feng 0.1.15 or earlier, especially where RTSP functionality is reachable from external or untrusted networks. The provided metadata does not identify CPEs, package names, or downstream products. Prioritize if Feng is internet-facing, business-critical, or unsupported. If no Feng deployment exists, document non-applicability. If Feng is present, plan containment and replacement because the provided sources do not name a definitive patch. Mitigation focus: Inventory systems for LScube Feng 0.1.15 and earlier.; Check vendor or project guidance for a fixed release or supported replacement.; Remove or retire unsupported Feng deployments where feasible..

Prepared

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2007-6626 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
1Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.