LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2007-6020: Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in foliosr.dll in the Folio Flat File speed reader in Autonomy (forme...

Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in foliosr.dll in the Folio Flat File speed reader in Autonomy (formerly Verity) KeyView 10.3.0.0, as used by IBM Lotus Notes, Symantec Mail Security, and activePDF DocConverter, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long attribute value in a (1) DI, (2) FD, (3) FT, (4) JD, (5) JL, (6) LE, (7) OB, (8) OD, (9) OL, (10) PN, (11) PS, (12) PW, (13) RD, (14) QL, or (15) TS tag in a .fff file.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysis

Security readout for executives and security teams

CVE-2007-6020 is an old but serious file-parsing flaw. A crafted Folio Flat File could crash or potentially take over software that uses Autonomy/Verity KeyView 10.3.0.0 to read those files, including named downstream products. Business urgency depends on whether legacy KeyView-based parsing still exists in mail, document conversion, or archival workflows. Exposure is most likely in legacy environments still running KeyView 10.3.0.0 or bundled products that parse .fff files. Internet exposure is indirect: malicious files would typically reach vulnerable systems through email scanning, document conversion, or user-opened content rather than a public network service. Treat this as high priority if legacy mail security, Notes, document conversion, or archival systems remain in production. If those products are absent, urgency drops substantially. The key executive decision is whether old parsing software is still handling untrusted documents anywhere in the environment. Mitigation focus: Inventory systems using Autonomy or Verity KeyView file parsing components.; Check IBM, Symantec, activePDF, and Autonomy guidance for fixed versions or updates.; Disable or restrict Folio Flat File parsing where business use is unnecessary..

Prepared

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2007-6020 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.