LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2007-5199: A single byte overflow in catalogue.c in X.Org libXfont 1.3.1 allows remote attackers to have unspecified i...

A single byte overflow in catalogue.c in X.Org libXfont 1.3.1 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysisunknown

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This is an old X.Org libXfont issue involving a one-byte overflow. The public CVE data says remote attackers could cause an unspecified impact, but it provides no CVSS score, CWE, CPE list, or confirmed exploitation. Business urgency depends on whether legacy systems still include libXfont 1.3.1.

Executive priority

Prioritize as legacy exposure cleanup unless inventory shows reachable systems still running affected libXfont builds. Absence of severity data prevents reliable risk scoring.

Technical view

CVE-2007-5199 describes a single-byte overflow in catalogue.c in X.Org libXfont 1.3.1. The source bundle references a SUSE bug and an upstream freedesktop commit, but does not document impact details, vulnerable CPEs, exploitability conditions, or fixed release versions.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to environments with X.Org libXfont 1.3.1 or derived vendor packages. The bundle does not enumerate affected products or CPEs, so asset inventory and package provenance matter.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not state active exploitation, and the CVE is not listed as KEV. The only attacker context given is remote attackers with unspecified impact.

Researcher notes

Evidence is sparse. The useful anchors are the CVE description, SUSE bug reference, and freedesktop commit. Do not assume code execution, affected platforms, or fixed versions beyond what vendor records confirm.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory systems for X.Org libXfont 1.3.1 or vendor-derived packages.
  • Review vendor advisories for fixed libXfont package versions.
  • Apply vendor-supported updates that include the referenced upstream fix.
  • Retire or isolate legacy systems that cannot receive trusted package updates.

Validation and detection

  • Check package manifests for libXfont version and vendor build metadata.
  • Confirm whether the upstream commit is present in deployed source or package changelogs.
  • Review SUSE or distro advisory status for affected legacy images.
  • Verify exposed services do not depend on vulnerable legacy X.Org font components.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2007-5199 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.