LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2006-3778: IBM Lotus Notes 6.0, 6.5, and 7.0 does not properly handle replies to e-mail messages with alternate name u...

IBM Lotus Notes 6.0, 6.5, and 7.0 does not properly handle replies to e-mail messages with alternate name users when the (1) "Save As Draft" option is used or (2) a "," (comma) is inside the "phrase" portion of an address, which can cause the e-mail to be sent to users that were deleted from the To, CC, and BCC fields, which allows remote attackers to obtain the list of original recipients.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysis

Security readout for executives and security teams

This is an email privacy flaw in IBM Lotus Notes 6.0, 6.5, and 7.0. Under specific reply and draft/address formatting conditions, recipients removed from To, CC, or BCC may still receive the message, exposing the original recipient list. It is not described as system compromise. Exposure is most likely in legacy environments still using IBM Lotus Notes 6.0, 6.5, or 7.0 for email workflows, especially where alternate name users or complex display-name address formatting are used. Treat as a privacy and confidentiality issue, not an infrastructure takeover risk. Priority rises where legacy Notes handles sensitive legal, HR, executive, customer, or regulated communications. Mitigation focus: Inventory any remaining Lotus Notes 6.0, 6.5, or 7.0 clients.; Check IBM guidance for fixed versions or vendor-recommended workarounds.; Prioritize migration from affected legacy Notes versions where still present..

Prepared

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2006-3778 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
1Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.